Post-marketing drug withdrawals: Pharmacovigilance success, regulatory problems

被引:20
作者
Aronson, Jeffery K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radcliffe Observ Quarter, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Oxford OX2 6GG, England
来源
THERAPIE | 2017年 / 72卷 / 05期
关键词
Pharmacovigilance; Regulation; Adverse drug reactions; Product surveillance; Post-marketing; Safety-based drug withdrawal;
D O I
10.1016/j.therap.2017.02.005
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Modern pharmacovigilance began in the 1960s, since when the subject has grown markedly, interest having particularly increased since 2010. One index of its success is the increasing speed with which serious adverse drug reactions are discovered after marketing of a medicinal product. However, the speed with which products have subsequently been withdrawn as a result of the discovery of serious adverse reactions has not consistently changed. This highlights problems that regulators and manufacturers face when serious reactions are discovered, with difficulties in deciding which of several consequent actions to take: to add specific warnings (cautions) or contraindications to the product label; to issue a Direct Healthcare Professional Communication; to allow informed patients to decide whether they will take the drug; or, in the most serious cases, to withdraw the product or revoke the licence. Conflicts of interest may inhibit decision-making. Recommendations that arise from these observations are that: health professionals and patients should be more vigorously encouraged to report suspected adverse drug reactions; regulatory authorities and drug manufacturers should take quicker confirmatory action when serious suspected adverse drug reactions are reported, even anecdotally, with formal studies to test for causality conducted sooner rather than later, applying lower than usual thresholds for suspicion; temporary suspensions or restrictions could be considered during such assessments; universal guidelines are needed for determining when a drug should be withdrawn if serious adverse drug reactions are suspected; there should be more rigorous monitoring and verification of deaths and reporting of reasons for drop-outs during clinical trials, with more transparency in reporting adverse events and ready access to premarketing clinical study reports; post-marketing drug monitoring systems and medicines regulation in low-to-middle income economies, especially in Africa, where withdrawals are fewer than elsewhere, should be strengthened. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Societe francaise de pharmacologie et de therapeutique.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 561
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, REACTIONS WEEKLY, V1368, P3
[2]  
Aronson J. K., 2015, MEYLERS SIDE EFFECTS
[3]   Balanced prescribing - principles and challenges [J].
Aronson, Jeffrey K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 74 (04) :566-572
[4]   Christmas 2009: Years Like This Patent medicines and secret remedies [J].
Aronson, Jeffrey K. .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339
[5]   A Strategy for Regulatory Action When New Adverse Effects of a Licensed Product Emerge [J].
Aronson, Jeffrey K. ;
Price, Deirdre ;
Ferner, Robin E. .
DRUG SAFETY, 2009, 32 (02) :91-98
[6]  
Aronson JK, 2016, TARIFFS
[7]  
Aronson JK, 2016, APOTHECARIES
[8]  
Aronson JK., 2004, SIDE EFFECTS DRUGS A, V27, pxxv
[9]  
Begaud B, 1993, METHODOLOGICAL APPRO
[10]   Reconciling informed consent with prescription drug requirements [J].
Eyal, Nir .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2012, 38 (10) :589-U22