Comparing Conventional and Biotechnology-Based Pest Management

被引:35
作者
Duke, Stephen O. [1 ]
机构
[1] ARS, Nat Prod Utilizat Res Unit, USDA, University, MS 38677 USA
关键词
biotechnology; Bt; glyphosate; herbicides; insecticides; pest management; transgenic crop; BACILLUS-THURINGIENSIS; INSECT RESISTANCE; BT COTTON; GLYPHOSATE RESISTANCE; TRANSGENIC PLANTS; CRYSTAL PROTEIN; MULTIPLE CROPS; CORN; MAIZE; GRAIN;
D O I
10.1021/jf200961r
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Pest management has changed dramatically during the past 15 years by the introduction of transgenes into crops for the purpose of pest management. Transgenes for herbicide resistance or for production of one or more Bt toxins are the predominant pest management traits currently available. These two traits have been rapidly adopted where available because of their superior efficacy and simplification of pest management for the farmer. Furthermore, they have substantially reduced the use of environmentally and toxicologically suspect pesticides while reducing the carbon footprint of pest management as reduced tillage became more common, along with fewer trips across the field to spray pesticides. The most successful of these products have been glyphosate-resistant crops, which cover approximately 85% of all land occupied by transgenic crops. Over-reliance on glyphosate with continual use of these crops has resulted in the evolution of highly problematic glyphosate-resistant weeds. This situation has resulted in some farmers using weed management methods similar to those used with conventional crops. Evolution of resistance has not been a significant problem with Bt crops, perhaps because of a mandated resistance management strategy. Transgenic crops with multiple genes for resistance to different herbicides and resistance to additional insects will be available in the next few years. These products will offer opportunities for the kind of pest management diversity that is more sustainable than that provided by the first generation of transgenic crops.
引用
收藏
页码:5793 / 5798
页数:6
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Abney MR, 2007, J COTTON SCI, V11, P35
[2]  
[Anonymous], GM CROP DAT
[3]   Insect resistance management in GM crops: past, present and future [J].
Bates, SL ;
Zhao, JZ ;
Roush, RT ;
Shelton, AM .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 23 (01) :57-62
[4]   Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests [J].
Betz, FS ;
Hammond, BG ;
Fuchs, RL .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 32 (02) :156-173
[5]   Perspectives on glyphosate resistance [J].
Bradshaw, LD ;
Padgette, SR ;
Kimball, SL ;
Wells, BH .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 11 (01) :189-198
[6]   Genetic Engineering of Maize (Zea mays) for High-Level Tolerance to Treatment with the Herbicide Dicamba [J].
Cao, Mingxia ;
Sato, Shirley J. ;
Behrens, Mark ;
Jiang, Wen Z. ;
Clemente, Thomas E. ;
Weeks, Donald P. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2011, 59 (11) :5830-5834
[7]  
Carpenter JE, 2004, ACS SYM SER, V866, P37
[8]   Farm-scale evaluation of the impacts of transgenic cotton on biodiversity, pesticide use, and yield [J].
Cattaneo, Manda G. ;
Yafuso, Christine ;
Schmidt, Chris ;
Huang, Cho-Ying ;
Rahman, Magfurar ;
Olson, Carl ;
Ellers-Kirk, Christa ;
Orr, Barron J. ;
Marsh, Stuart E. ;
Antilla, Larry ;
Dutilleu, Pierre ;
Carriere, Yves .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (20) :7571-7576
[9]   The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: A review [J].
Cerdeira, Antonio L. ;
Duke, Stephen O. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 35 (05) :1633-1658
[10]   Agricultural Impacts of Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Cultivation in South America [J].
Cerdeira, Antonio L. ;
Gazziero, Dionsio L. P. ;
Duke, Stephen O. ;
Matallo, Marcus B. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2011, 59 (11) :5799-5807