Extending INR testing intervals in warfarin patients at a multi-center anticoagulation clinic

被引:2
|
作者
Papala, Michelle [1 ]
Gillard, Deborah [2 ]
Hardman, Jennifer [3 ]
Romano, Teresa [4 ]
Rein, Lisa E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Froedtert Hosp, Froedtert & Med Coll Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Froedtert Hosp, Froedtert & Med Coll Wisconsin, Anticoagulat Clin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[3] Froedtert Hosp, Froedtert & Med Coll Wisconsin, Ambulatory Pharm Serv, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[4] Froedtert Hosp, Froedtert & Med Coll Wisconsin, Anticoagulat & Rheumatol Clin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[5] Med Coll Wisconsin, Inst Hlth & Equ, Div Biostat, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
Warfarin; INR testing interval; Time in therapeutic range (TTR); Protocol; Collaborative practice agreement; COVID-19; pandemic; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; QUALITY; PREDICTORS; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s11239-021-02566-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Warfarin has been used as an anticoagulant by millions of patients due to its effectiveness, availability, and low cost. Evidence on the safe extension of international normalized ratio (INR) testing frequency remains an area of interest, especially during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to safely extend INR testing intervals in patients throughout a multisite, system-wide anticoagulation clinic. Updates were made to the pharmacist's collaborative practice agreement (CPA) and nurse protocol to optimize practice and allow INR testing interval extension up to a maximum of 8-weeks. The primary outcome was the change in duration between INR tests (INR testing interval) measured before and after providing staff education on clinic updates. The mean duration between INR tests (SD) was 23.69 days (11.29) in the pre-intervention period and 25.58 days (13.91) in the post-intervention period. During the COVID-19 pandemic (post2), intervals were extended further to 27.81 days (14.96), demonstrating a statistically significant increase in INR testing interval from pre-intervention to post-intervention and to post2 (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). A secondary outcome indicated the mean time in therapeutic range (SD) showed no significant difference in pre-intervention 70.11% (25.95) versus post-intervention of 69.76% (25.69) with a difference of - 0.35% (29.93) (p = 0.956) or versus the post2 of 68.82% (27.20) with a difference of - 1.29% (33.20) (p = 0.120). This study showed that changes to the CPA and protocol allowed for a significant increase in INR testing interval while simultaneously maintaining a mean time in therapeutic range > 60% for the clinic population.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 632
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of a Knowledge Test in Turkish Patients on Warfarin Therapy at an Ambulatory Anticoagulation Clinic
    Turker, Meltem
    Sancar, Mesut
    Demirtunc, Refik
    Ucar, Nazlican
    Uzman, Osman
    Ay, Pinar
    Kozan, Omer
    Okuyan, Betul
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 18 (04) : 445 - 451
  • [22] Poor anticoagulation control in patients taking warfarin at a tertiary and district-level prothrombin clinic in Cape Town, South Africa
    Ebrahim, I.
    Bryer, A.
    Cohen, K.
    Mouton, J. P.
    Msemburi, W.
    Blockman, M.
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 108 (06): : 490 - 494
  • [23] Comparison of prothrombin time (INR) results and main characteristics of patients on warfarin treatment in primary health care centers and anticoagulation clinics
    Arbring, Kerstin
    Uppugunduri, Srinivas
    Lindahl, Tomas L.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13 : 85
  • [24] Medium and long-term follow-up in Chinese patients receiving low intensity warfarin anticoagulation treatment with low International Normalized Ratio (INR) after mechanical mitral valve replacement
    Tang, Peizhe
    Chang, Qing
    Dong, Mingfeng
    Ma, Shengjun
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (05): : 2315 - 2319
  • [25] Warfarin-related outcomes in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome managed in an anticoagulation clinic
    Wittkowsky, Ann K.
    Downing, Jennifer
    Blackburn, Juan
    Nutescu, Edith
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2006, 96 (02) : 137 - 141
  • [26] Is INR between 2.0 and 3.0 the optimal level for Chinese patients on warfarin therapy for moderate-intensity anticoagulation?
    You, JHS
    Chan, FWH
    Wong, RSM
    Cheng, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 59 (05) : 582 - 587
  • [27] Chinese Patients With Heart Valve Replacement Do Not Benefit From Warfarin Pharmacogenetic Testing on Anticoagulation Outcomes
    Hao, Yexia
    Yang, Jun
    Zheng, Xuan
    Hu, Yuanping
    Yan, Xinsheng
    Zhang, Litao
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2019, 41 (06) : 748 - 754
  • [28] Quality of anticoagulation care in patients discharged from a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic after stabilization of warfarin therapy
    Garwood, Candice L.
    Dumo, Peter
    Baringhaus, Stephanie N.
    Laban, Kristyn M.
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2008, 28 (01): : 20 - 26
  • [29] Multi-center survey regarding the management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for endoscopic procedures in Japan
    Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
    Oda, Ichiro
    Yamamoto, Yorimasa
    Akiyama, Junichi
    Ishii, Naoki
    Kakushima, Naomi
    Fujiwara, Junko
    Morishita, Shinji
    Kawachi, Hiroshi
    Taniguchi, Hirokazu
    Gotoda, Takuji
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 24 (02) : 214 - 218
  • [30] Warfarin Therapy Still Survives as an Anticoagulation Treatment for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation - Importance of Maintaining the Target PT-INR
    Kawamura, Yuichiro
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2014, 78 (06) : 1320 - 1322