Assessment of Volume Measurement of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema by Three Methods: Circumference Measurement, Water Displacement, and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

被引:81
作者
Gjorup, Caroline [1 ]
Zerahn, Bo [1 ]
Hendel, Helle W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Herlev Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Physiol & Nucl Med, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
关键词
BODY-COMPOSITION; ARM LYMPHEDEMA; EDEMA; VALIDATION; LIMB; DIAGNOSIS; STANDARD; VALIDITY; TISSUE; BONE;
D O I
10.1089/lrb.2009.0016
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Following treatment for breast cancer 12%-60% develop breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). There are several ways of assessing BCRL. Circumference measurement (CM) and water displacement (WD) for volume measurements (VM) are frequently used methods in practice and research, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate CM and WD for VM of the BCRL arm and the contralateral arm, comparing the results with regional dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Methods and Results: Twenty-four women with unilateral BCRL were included in the study. Blinded duplicate VM were obtained from both arms using the three methods mentioned above. CM and DXA were performed by two observers. WD was performed by a group of observers. Mean differences (d) in duplicated volumes, limits of agreement (LOA), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each method. The repeatability expressed as d (95% CI) between the duplicated VM of the BCRL arm and the contralateral arm was for DXA 3 ml (-6-11) and 3 ml (1-7), respectively. For CM and WD, the d (95% CI) of the BCRL arm were 107 ml (86-127) and 26 ml (-26-79), respectively and in the contralateral arm 100 ml (78-122) and 6 ml (-29-17), respectively. Conclusions: DXA is superior in repeatability when compared to CM and WD for VM, especially for the BCRL arm but also the contralateral arm.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 119
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Armer Jane M., 2005, Lymphatic Research and Biology, V3, P208, DOI 10.1089/lrb.2005.3.208
  • [2] Dual X-ray absorptiometry model for characterizing water in the human forearm using multiple frequency bioimpedance analysis
    Bartolini, Miria E.
    Wilson, Kyle
    Raja, Mohan
    Raymer, Graydon H.
    Thompson, R. Terry
    Webber, Colin E.
    Moran, Gerald R.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 84 (02) : 181 - 193
  • [3] COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982): : 1085 - 1087
  • [4] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [5] Brorson Hakan, 2009, Lymphatic Research and Biology, V7, P3, DOI 10.1089/lrb.2008.1022
  • [6] CAVALIERE CM, 2004, MICHIGAN MANUAL PLAS, P86
  • [7] CHEN WY, 2007, BREAST CANC, pR4
  • [8] Diagnosis and therapy in children with lymphoedema
    Damstra, R. J.
    Mortimer, P. S.
    [J]. PHLEBOLOGY, 2008, 23 (06) : 276 - 286
  • [9] Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: a new gold standard for arm volume measurements
    Damstra, Robert J.
    Glazenburg, Eltjo J.
    Hop, Wim C. J.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 99 (03) : 267 - 273
  • [10] Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and body composition: Differences between devices and comparison with reference methods
    Genton, L
    Hans, D
    Kyle, UG
    Pichard, C
    [J]. NUTRITION, 2002, 18 (01) : 66 - 70