The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes

被引:242
作者
Clark, Samuel A. [1 ]
Hickey, John M.
Daetwyler, Hans D. [1 ,2 ]
van der Werf, Julius H. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New England, CRC Sheep Ind Innovat, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
[2] Dept Primary Ind, Biosci Res Div, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
关键词
GENETIC-RELATIONSHIP INFORMATION; SELECTION; ACCURACY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/1297-9686-44-4
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background: The theory of genomic selection is based on the prediction of the effects of genetic markers in linkage disequilibrium with quantitative trait loci. However, genomic selection also relies on relationships between individuals to accurately predict genetic value. This study aimed to examine the importance of information on relatives versus that of unrelated or more distantly related individuals on the estimation of genomic breeding values. Methods: Simulated and real data were used to examine the effects of various degrees of relationship on the accuracy of genomic selection. Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (gBLUP) was compared to two pedigree based BLUP methods, one with a shallow one generation pedigree and the other with a deep ten generation pedigree. The accuracy of estimated breeding values for different groups of selection candidates that had varying degrees of relationships to a reference data set of 1750 animals was investigated. Results: The gBLUP method predicted breeding values more accurately than BLUP. The most accurate breeding values were estimated using gBLUP for closely related animals. Similarly, the pedigree based BLUP methods were also accurate for closely related animals, however when the pedigree based BLUP methods were used to predict unrelated animals, the accuracy was close to zero. In contrast, gBLUP breeding values, for animals that had no pedigree relationship with animals in the reference data set, allowed substantial accuracy. Conclusions: An animal's relationship to the reference data set is an important factor for the accuracy of genomic predictions. Animals that share a close relationship to the reference data set had the highest accuracy from genomic predictions. However a baseline accuracy that is driven by the reference data set size and the overall population effective population size enables gBLUP to estimate a breeding value for unrelated animals within a population (breed), using information previously ignored by pedigree based BLUP methods.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] *AWI, 2010, GAIN GEN
  • [2] Fast and flexible simulation of DNA sequence data
    Chen, Gary K.
    Marjoram, Paul
    Wall, Jeffrey D.
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (01) : 136 - 142
  • [3] Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation
    Clark, Samuel A.
    Hickey, John M.
    van der Werf, Julius H. J.
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43
  • [4] Accuracy of estimated genomic breeding values for wool and meat traits in a multi-breed sheep population
    Daetwyler, H. D.
    Hickey, J. M.
    Henshall, J. M.
    Dominik, S.
    Gredler, B.
    van der Werf, J. H. J.
    Hayes, B. J.
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2010, 50 (11-12) : 1004 - 1010
  • [5] The Impact of Genetic Architecture on Genome-Wide Evaluation Methods
    Daetwyler, Hans D.
    Pong-Wong, Ricardo
    Villanueva, Beatriz
    Woolliams, John A.
    [J]. GENETICS, 2010, 185 (03) : 1021 - 1031
  • [6] Fisher RA., 1918, T ROY SOC EDINBURGH, V52, P399, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0080456800012163
  • [7] Gilmore A.R., 2009, Asreml User Guide Release 3.0
  • [8] Goddard M. E., 2006, Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 13-18 August, 2006, P22
  • [9] Genomic selection
    Goddard, M. E.
    Hayes, B. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2007, 124 (06) : 323 - 330
  • [10] Genomic selection in livestock populations
    Goddard, Michael E.
    Hayes, Ben J.
    Meuwissen, Theo H. E.
    [J]. GENETICS RESEARCH, 2010, 92 (5-6) : 413 - 421