Do voluntary environmental management systems improve environmental performance? Evidence from waste management by Kenyan firms

被引:49
作者
Mungai, Edward M. [1 ]
Ndiritu, S. Wagura [1 ]
Rajwani, Tazeeb [2 ]
机构
[1] Strathmore Univ, Sch Business, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Univ Surrey, Surrey Business Sch, Dept Strategy & Int Business, Guildford, Surrey, England
关键词
Voluntary environmental management system; United Nations Global Compact; ISO; 14001; Environmental performance and developing economies; ISO; 14001; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; DEVELOPING-WORLD; IMPACT; CERTIFICATION; GOVERNANCE; STANDARD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121636
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We examine whether the adoption of global voluntary environmental management systems - United Nations Global Compact and ISO 14001 - lead to more effective environmental performance. Previous studies have presented inconclusive findings of voluntary environmental management systems on environmental performances. Possible reasons for conflicting results are the influence of observable and unobservable factors that affect environmental performance as well as the use of different measures of environmental performance indicators. Using primary data from Kenyan firms in 2019, waste management defined by wastewater recycling, solid waste reusing and use of environmentally safe disposal methods, we determine the effects of voluntary environmental management systems (VEMS) on firm-level environmental performance. We conclude that the adoption of VEMS are associated with significant improvement in environmental performance in developing economies. Our conclusions provide insights to corporate management and policy makers in developing countries on decisions regarding better environmental management. VEMS forms an environmental management tool suitable in confronting wastewater and physical refuse challenges as well as conducive waste disposal methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration [J].
Abbott, Kenneth W. ;
Snidal, Duncan .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, 2010, 5 (03) :315-344
[2]  
Alauddin M., 2006, WORKING PAPER
[3]   Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools [J].
Altonji, JG ;
Elder, TE ;
Taber, CR .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2005, 113 (01) :151-184
[4]   A study on the impact of environmental management system (EMS) certification towards firms' performance in Malaysia [J].
Ann, Goh Eng ;
Zailani, Suhaiza ;
Abd Wahid, Nabsiah .
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 17 (01) :73-93
[5]  
Annandale D., 2004, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V13, P1, DOI [10.1002/bse.390, DOI 10.1002/BSE.390]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ENV POLICY LAW
[7]   The Global Compact: an analysis of the motivations of adoption in the Spanish context [J].
Arevalo, Jorge A. ;
Aravind, Deepa ;
Ayuso, Silvia ;
Roca, MercS .
BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2013, 22 (01) :1-15
[8]   Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument? A case for environmental management systems [J].
Arimura, Toshi H. ;
Hibiki, Akira ;
Katayama, Hajime .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 55 (03) :281-295
[9]   The effect of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: Resolving equivocal findings [J].
Arimura, Toshi H. ;
Darnall, Nicole ;
Ganguli, Rama ;
Katayama, Hajime .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 166 :556-566
[10]   Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding participation in EPA's 33/50 program [J].
Arora, S ;
Cason, TN .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1996, 72 (04) :413-432