Clinical practice and quality assurance challenges in modern brachytherapy sources and dosimetry

被引:13
作者
Butler, Wayne M. [1 ,2 ]
Merrick, Gregory S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wheeling Hosp, Schiffler Canc Ctr, Wheeling, WV 26003 USA
[2] Wheeling Jesuit Univ, Wheeling, WV USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2008年 / 71卷 / 01期
关键词
brachytherapy; calibration; quality assurance; radionuclides; dosimetry;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.084
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Modern brachytherapy has led to effective treatments through the establishment of broadly applicable dosimetric thresholds for maximizing survival with minimal morbidity. Proper implementation of recent dosimetric consensus statements and quality assurance procedures is necessary to maintain the established level of safety and efficacy. This review classifies issues as either "systematic" or "stochastic" in terms of their impact on large groups or individual patients, respectively. Systematic changes affecting large numbers of patients occur infrequently and include changes in source dosimetric parameters, prescribing practice, dose calculation formalism, and improvements in calculation algorithms. The physicist must be aware of how incipient changes accord with previous experience. Stochastic issues involve procedures that are applied to each patient individually. Although ample guidance for quality assurance of brachytherapy sources exists, some ambiguities remain. The latest American Association of Physicists in Medicine guidance clarifies what is meant by independent assay, changes source sampling recommendations, particularly for sources in sterile strands and sterile preassembled needles, and modifies action level thresholds. The changing environment of brachytherapy has not changed the fact that the prime responsibility for quality assurance in brachytherapy lies with the institutional medical physicist. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:S142 / S146
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]   DOSIMETRY OF INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES - RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE AAPM RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE TASK GROUP NO 43 [J].
NATH, R ;
ANDERSON, LL ;
LUXTON, G ;
WEAVER, KA ;
WILLIAMSON, JF ;
MEIGOONI, AS .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (02) :209-234
[12]  
*RAD PHYS CTR, JOINT AAPM RPC REG B
[13]   Sampling size in the verification of manufactured-supplied air kerma strengths [J].
Ramos, LI ;
Monge, RM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (11) :3375-3378
[14]   American Brachytherapy Society recommends no change for prostate permanent implant dose prescriptions using iodine-125 or palladium-103 [J].
Rivard, Mark J. ;
Butler, Wayne M. ;
Devlin, Phillip M. ;
Hayes, John K., Jr. ;
Hearn, Robert A. ;
Lief, Eugene P. ;
Meigooni, Ali S. ;
Merrick, Gregory S. ;
Williamson, Jeffrey F. .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2007, 6 (01) :34-37
[15]   Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations [J].
Rivard, MJ ;
Coursey, BM ;
DeWerd, LA ;
Hanson, WF ;
Huq, MS ;
Ibbott, GS ;
Mitch, MG ;
Nath, R ;
Williamson, JF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (03) :633-674
[16]   Toward a statistically relevant calibration end point for prostate seed implants [J].
Rosenzweig, DP ;
Schell, MC ;
Yu, Y .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (01) :144-150
[17]  
*US NUCL REG COMM, 2003, PNO203020 US NUCL RE
[18]   Evaluation of an automated seed loader for seed calibration in prostate brachytherapy [J].
Wan, Shuying ;
Joshi, Chandra P. ;
Carnes, Greg ;
Schreiner, L. John .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 7 (01) :115-125
[19]   Recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine regarding the impact of implementing the 2004 task group 43 report on dose specification for 103Pd and 125I interstitial brachytherapy [J].
Williamson, JF ;
Butler, W ;
DeWerd, LA ;
Huq, MS ;
Ibbott, GS ;
Li, Z ;
Mitch, MG ;
Nath, R ;
Rivard, MJ ;
Todor, D .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (05) :1424-1439
[20]   Permanent prostate seed implant brachytherapy: Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 64 [J].
Yu, Y ;
Anderson, LL ;
Li, ZF ;
Mellenberg, DE ;
Nath, R ;
Schell, MC ;
Waterman, FM ;
Wu, A ;
Blasko, JC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (10) :2054-2076