Clinical practice and quality assurance challenges in modern brachytherapy sources and dosimetry

被引:13
作者
Butler, Wayne M. [1 ,2 ]
Merrick, Gregory S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wheeling Hosp, Schiffler Canc Ctr, Wheeling, WV 26003 USA
[2] Wheeling Jesuit Univ, Wheeling, WV USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2008年 / 71卷 / 01期
关键词
brachytherapy; calibration; quality assurance; radionuclides; dosimetry;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.084
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Modern brachytherapy has led to effective treatments through the establishment of broadly applicable dosimetric thresholds for maximizing survival with minimal morbidity. Proper implementation of recent dosimetric consensus statements and quality assurance procedures is necessary to maintain the established level of safety and efficacy. This review classifies issues as either "systematic" or "stochastic" in terms of their impact on large groups or individual patients, respectively. Systematic changes affecting large numbers of patients occur infrequently and include changes in source dosimetric parameters, prescribing practice, dose calculation formalism, and improvements in calculation algorithms. The physicist must be aware of how incipient changes accord with previous experience. Stochastic issues involve procedures that are applied to each patient individually. Although ample guidance for quality assurance of brachytherapy sources exists, some ambiguities remain. The latest American Association of Physicists in Medicine guidance clarifies what is meant by independent assay, changes source sampling recommendations, particularly for sources in sterile strands and sterile preassembled needles, and modifies action level thresholds. The changing environment of brachytherapy has not changed the fact that the prime responsibility for quality assurance in brachytherapy lies with the institutional medical physicist. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:S142 / S146
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*AM SOC THER RAD O, COD GUID OUTP HOSP D
[2]   Third party brachytherapy seed calibrations and physicist responsibilities [J].
Butler, WM ;
Huq, MS ;
Li, ZF ;
Thomadsen, BR ;
DeWerd, LA ;
Ibbott, GS ;
Mitch, MG ;
Nath, R ;
Rivard, MJ ;
Williamson, JE ;
Yue, NJ ;
Zaider, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (01) :247-248
[3]   MCPI©:: A sub-minute Monte Carlo dose calculation engine for prostate implants [J].
Chibani, O ;
Williamson, JF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (12) :3688-3698
[4]   Dosimetric effects of seed anisotropy and interseed attenuation for 103Pd and 125I prostate implants [J].
Chibani, O ;
Williamson, JF ;
Todor, D .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (08) :2557-2566
[5]   Calibration of multiple LDR brachytherapy sources [J].
DeWerd, Larry A. ;
Micka, John A. ;
Holmes, Shannon M. ;
Bohm, Tim D. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (10) :3804-3813
[6]   Quality assurance of I-125 seeds for prostate brachytherapy using an imaging plate [J].
Furutani, Shunsuke ;
Saze, Takuya ;
Ikushima, Hitoshi ;
Oita, Masataka ;
Ozaki, Kyousuke ;
Kishida, Yoshlomi ;
Takegawa, Yoshihiro ;
Nishitani, Hiromu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (02) :603-609
[7]  
Kaplan Irving D, 2004, Brachytherapy, V3, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.brachy.2003.12.003
[8]   COMPREHENSIVE QA FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY - REPORT OF AAPM RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE TASK-GROUP-40 [J].
KUTCHER, GJ ;
COIA, L ;
GILLIN, M ;
HANSON, WF ;
LEIBEL, S ;
MORTON, RJ ;
PALTA, JR ;
PURDY, JA ;
REINSTEIN, LE ;
SVENSSON, GK ;
WELLER, M ;
WINGFIELD, L .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (04) :581-618
[9]   Seed fixity in the prostate/periprostatic region following brachytherapy [J].
Merrick, GS ;
Butler, WM ;
Dorsey, AT ;
Lief, JH ;
Benson, ML .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (01) :215-220
[10]   Code of practice for brachytherapy physics: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 56 [J].
Nath, R ;
Anderson, LL ;
Meli, JA ;
Olch, AJ ;
Stitt, JA ;
Williamson, JF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (10) :1557-1598