Initial Experience with the Comprehensive Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Technique Based on Membrane Anatomy for Treating Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

被引:2
|
作者
Wu, Guohao [1 ]
Li, Haomin [2 ]
Zhong, Peifeng [2 ]
Chen, Dongjiang [2 ]
Zhang, Zhihua [2 ]
Guo, Zexiong [2 ]
Zhuo, Yumin [2 ]
Xue, Lianfang [3 ]
Lai, Caiyong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp 6, Dongguan, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Dept Pharm, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Membrane anatomy; Modifications; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction; Laparoscopy; DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY; RETROPERITONEAL; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1159/000519929
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the objective was to present our initial experience and evaluate the feasibility of the novel comprehensive modified laparoscopic pyeloplasty (CMLP) technique based on membrane anatomy. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight patients underwent CMLP from February 2016 to October 2020. CMLP involves the following: dissection of the ureter was based on the fascia or fusion fascia formed by embryonic development. The ureter was separated from the ureteral sheath, and the pelvis and ureter were incised with incomplete amputation. The first stitch was placed between the lower point of the spatulated ureter and the lowest corner of the renal pelvis to ensure correct orientation of the anastomosis; anastomosis of the renal pelvis and ureter was performed using the touchless technique. Results: All CMLPs were completed successfully without conversion. The mean overall operating time was 230.96 min. The median estimated blood loss was 50.00 (interquartile range 20.00-57.50) mL. The average postoperative hospital stay was 9.31 days. The average follow-up time was 24.73 months. No major complications occurred. In 1 case, revision laparoscopic pyeloplasty was performed, but the obstruction persisted after double J stent removal, so ultimately, the double J stent required regular replacement. Another asymptomatic patient with hydronephrosis experienced failed treatment and is still under follow-up. The overall success rate was 95.83% (46/48). The success rate in patients with recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) was 87.5% (7/8). Conclusions: CMLP is a practical and effective treatment option for UPJO with a high success rate. An advantage of CMLP is the clear surgical field.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 494
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty for treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.: Technique and results
    Subotic, S.
    Schulze, M.
    Goezen, A.
    Rassweiler, J.
    Teber, D.
    UROLOGE, 2008, 47 (06): : 718 - 723
  • [2] Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants
    Turner, Robert M., II
    Fox, Janelle A.
    Tomaszewski, Jeffrey J.
    Schneck, Francis X.
    Docimo, Steven G.
    Ost, Michael C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04) : 1503 - 1506
  • [3] Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
    Szavay, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 31 (10): : 1214 - 1218
  • [4] Head-to-Head Comparison of Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in China
    Hong, Peng
    Ding, Guangpu
    Zhu, Dongdong
    Yang, Kunlin
    Pan, Jinhong
    Li, Xuesong
    Chen, Zhipeng
    Zhang, Lei
    Tang, Qi
    Hao, Han
    Zhou, Zhansong
    Zhou, Liqun
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2018, 101 (03) : 337 - 344
  • [5] Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children
    Kojima, Yoshiyuki
    Sasaki, Shoichi
    Mizuno, Kentaro
    Tozawa, Keiichi
    Hayashi, Yutaro
    Kohri, Kenjiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) : 472 - 476
  • [6] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Outcome of initial 12 procedures
    Iwamura, M
    Soh, S
    Irie, A
    Kadowaki, K
    Matsusita, Y
    Fujioka, T
    Baba, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 11 (07) : 449 - 455
  • [7] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Sundaram, CP
    Grubb, RL
    Rehman, J
    Yan, Y
    Chen, C
    Landman, J
    McDougall, EM
    Clayman, RV
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) : 2037 - 2040
  • [8] Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children
    Sweeney, Danielle D.
    Ost, Michael C.
    Schneck, Francis X.
    Docimo, Steven G.
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 21 (03): : 261 - 265
  • [9] Laparoscopic Disconnected Pyeloplasty to Treat Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO) in Children
    Chen, Jian-cai
    Zhang, Qi-liang
    Wang, Yun-jin
    Cui, Xu
    Chen, Liu
    Zhang, Jian-qin
    Zhou, Chao-ming
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2019, 25 : 9131 - 9137
  • [10] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children
    Abdel-Karim, A. M.
    Fahmy, A.
    Moussa, A.
    Rashad, H.
    Elbadry, M.
    Badawy, H.
    Hammady, A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2016, 12 (06) : 401.e1 - 401.e6