Honest and Deceptive Impression Management in the Employment Interview: Can It Be Detected and How Does It Impact Evaluations?

被引:101
作者
Roulin, Nicolas [1 ]
Bangerter, Adrian [2 ]
Levashina, Julia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V4, Canada
[2] Univ Neuchatel, CH-2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland
[3] Kent State Univ, Kent, OH USA
关键词
SELF-PRESENTATION; STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; RESPONSE DISTORTION; 1ST IMPRESSIONS; APPLICANT; TACTICS; PERSONALITY; FAKING; EXPERIENCE; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/peps.12079
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Applicants use honest and deceptive impression management (IM) in employment interviews. Deceptive IM is especially problematic because it can lead organizations to hire less competent but deceptive applicants if interviewers are not able to identify the deception. We investigated interviewers' capacity to detect IM in 5 experimental studies using real-time video coding of IM (N = 246 professional interviewers and 270 novice interviewers). Interviewers' attempts to detect applicants' IM were often unsuccessful. Interviewers were better at detecting honest than deceptive IM. Interview question type affected IM detection, but interviewers' experience did not. Finally, interviewers' perceptions of IM use by applicants were related to their evaluations of applicants' performance in the interview. Interviewers' attempts to adjust their evaluations of applicants they perceive to use deceptive IM may fail because they cannot correctly identify when applicants actually engage in various IM tactics. Helping interviewers to better identify deceptive IM tactics used by applicants may increase the validity of employment interviews.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 444
页数:50
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DYADIC DATA ANAL
[3]   On making causal claims: A review and recommendations [J].
Antonakis, John ;
Bendahan, Samuel ;
Jacquart, Philippe ;
Lalive, Rafael .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2010, 21 (06) :1086-1120
[4]   The Magnitude and Extent of Cheating and Response Distortion Effects on Unproctored Internet-Based Tests of Cognitive Ability and Personality [J].
Arthur, Winfred, Jr. ;
Glaze, Ryan M. ;
Villado, Anton J. ;
Taylor, Jason E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2010, 18 (01) :1-16
[5]   Effects of Impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Mount, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 81 (03) :261-272
[6]   What You See May Not Be What You Get: Relationships Among Self-Presentation Tactics and Ratings of Interview and Job Performance [J].
Barrick, Murray R. ;
Shaffer, Jonathan A. ;
DeGrassi, Sandra W. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (06) :1394-1411
[7]   The Construct of State-Level Suspicion A Model and Research Agenda for Automated and Information Technology (IT) Contexts [J].
Bobko, Philip ;
Barelka, Alex J. ;
Hirshfield, Leanne M. .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2014, 56 (03) :489-508
[8]   A Multi-Level Review of Impression Management Motives and Behaviors [J].
Bolino, Mark C. ;
Kacmar, K. Michele ;
Tumley, William H. ;
Gilstrap, J. Bruce .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2008, 34 (06) :1080-1109
[9]   Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias [J].
Bond, Charles F., Jr. ;
DePaulo, Bella M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2008, 134 (04) :477-492
[10]   Accuracy of deception judgments [J].
Bond, Charles F., Jr. ;
DePaulo, Bella M. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 10 (03) :214-234