Paradiplomacy practices in Indonesia: Comparative analysis of Aceh-Quebec

被引:1
作者
Dermawan, Windy [1 ]
Darmawwan, Ban [2 ]
Mustofa, Mustabsyirotul Ummah [3 ]
Yusa, Djuyandi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padjadjaran, Dept Int Relat, Sumedang, Indonesia
[2] Univ Padjadjaran, Dept Govt Sci, Sumedang, Indonesia
[3] Univ Padjadjaran, Dept Polit Sci, Sumedang, Indonesia
关键词
Aceh Province; Canada; central government; comparative policy; domestic political development; federalism; foreign policy; foreign relations; Indonesia; international relations/governance; paradiplomacy activities; policy analysis; policy design; protodiplomacy; Quebec; regional foreign activities; regional policy/regionalization; special autonomy; subnational interests; substate actors; unitary state system; FOREIGN-POLICY;
D O I
10.1111/polp.12455
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article aims to understand paradiplomacy practices in Indonesia by identifying the characteristics of Aceh's paradiplomacy and reviewing it comparatively with the paradiplomacy of Quebec, Canada. The data was collected by documentation study, interview, and literature search. The practice of paradiplomacy in Indonesia is framed in a unitary state system in which the central government still dominates regional foreign activities and the regional awareness for the need of foreign relations is still minimal. This is different from the Province of Quebec in Canada wherein Quebec is one of the most active provinces to take part abroad for the fulfillment of their regional interests. We conclude that the characteristics of paradiplomacy are determined by the institutionalization of paradiplomacy in the regions and the pattern of relations between the central and regional government which usually refers to the form of the state whether unitary or federalist.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 379
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Apipudin B., 2016, BULETIN AL TURAS MIM, VXXII, DOI 10.15408/bat.v22i1.7221
[2]  
Bustamam-Ahmad Kamaruzzaman., 2013, ULAMA SEPARATISME DA
[3]  
Criekemans David., 2010, DISCUSSION PAPERS DI
[4]  
Feener Michael R., 2010, NEW CAMBRIDGE HIST I, P470
[5]  
Fry EarlH., 1998, EXPANDING ROLE STATE
[6]  
Garesch? EugeneD.Zapata., 2007, GUIDELINES INT RELAT
[7]  
Haydanka Y., 2020, OnLine Journal Modelling the New Europe, P111, DOI [10.24193/OJMNE.2020.33.06, DOI 10.24193/OJMNE.2020.33.06]
[8]  
Haydanka Yevheniy., 2020, Viesoji politika ir administravimas, V19, P253
[9]   Affirmation without Recognition: Assessing Quebec's Recent Initiative for Constitutional Engagement [J].
Iacovino, Raffaele .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF CANADIAN STUDIES, 2020, 50 (03) :326-339
[10]  
Ihnatyshyn, 2019, SCI B MUKACHEVO ST E, V1, P11