Timed activity performance in persons with upper limb amputation: A preliminary study

被引:8
作者
Resnik, Linda [1 ,2 ]
Borgia, Mathew [1 ]
Acluche, Frantzy [1 ]
机构
[1] Providence VA Med Ctr, 830 Chalkstone Ave, Providence, RI USA
[2] Brown Univ, Hlth Serv Policy & Practice, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
Amputation; Disability evaluation; Upper limb; Daily activities; Prosthetics; Measurement; ELBOW DEFICIENCY; PROSTHESES; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jht.2017.03.008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: 55 subjects with upper limb amputation were administered the T-MAP twice within one week. Purpose: To develop a timed measure of activity performance for persons with upper limb amputation (T-MAP); examine the measure's internal consistency, test-retest reliability and validity; and compare scores by prosthesis use. Introduction: Measures of activity performance for persons with upper limb amputation are needed The time required to perform daily activities is a meaningful metric that implication for participation in life roles. Methods: Internal consistency and test -retest reliability were evaluated. Construct validity was examined by comparing scores by amputation level. Exploratory analyses compared sub-group scores, and examined correlations with other measures. Results: Scale alpha was 0.77, ICC was 0.93. Timed scores differed by amputation level. Subjects using a prosthesis took longer to perform all tasks. T-MAP was not correlated with other measures of dexterity or activity, but was correlated with pain for non-prosthesis users. Discussion: The timed scale had adequate internal consistency and excellent test -retest reliability. Conclusions: Analyses support reliability and construct validity of the T-MAR. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Hanley & Belfus, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 476
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, J PROSTHET ORTHOT, DOI DOI 10.1097/JPO.0B013E3181AE970B
  • [2] [Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1177/030802268004300207
  • [3] Atkins D, 2004, ATLAS AMPUTATIONS LI, P27
  • [4] Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches
    Beaton, DE
    Wright, JG
    Katz, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (05) : 1038 - 1046
  • [5] Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks
    Bouwsema, Hanneke
    van der Sluis, Corry K.
    Bongers, Raoul M.
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2010, 25 (06) : 523 - 529
  • [6] Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review
    Carey, Stephanie L.
    Lura, Derek J.
    Highsmith, M. Jason
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 52 (03) : 247 - 262
  • [7] Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency - acquired and congenital
    Datta, D
    Selvarajah, K
    Davey, N
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2004, 18 (02) : 172 - 177
  • [8] Prosthetic management of children with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency
    Davids, JR
    Wagner, LV
    Meyer, LC
    Blackhurst, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (06) : 1294 - 1300
  • [9] Dillingham T., 1998, Rehabil. Inj. Combat, P33
  • [10] Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments
    Heinemann, AW
    Bode, RK
    O'Reilly, C
    [J]. PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 27 (03) : 191 - 206