Trends in incidence and tumour grade in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer

被引:20
作者
Luiten, Jacky D. [1 ,4 ]
Voogd, Adri C. [2 ,3 ]
Luiten, Ernest J. T. [4 ]
Duijm, Lucien E. M. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Univ Med Ctr, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, S Gravendijkwal 230, NL-3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Res Inst GROW, Dept Epidemiol, Utrechtse Singel 40, NL-6229 ER Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Dept Res, Godebaldkwartier 419, NL-3511 DT Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Amphia Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Molengracht 21, NL-4818 CK Breda, Netherlands
[5] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Radiol, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, NL-6532 SZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Dutch Reference Ctr Screening, Wijchenseweg 101, NL-6538 SW Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Invasive breast cancer; Tumour grade; MAMMOGRAPHY; NETHERLANDS; PROGRAM; OVERDIAGNOSIS; OVERTREATMENT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-017-4412-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In a biennial screening mammography programme, we analysed the trends in incidence of screen-detected DCIS and invasive breast cancers in the era of screen-film mammography (SFM) screening, the period of the transition to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) screening and the period of FFDM screening. We also investigated a possible association between the incidence and grading of screen-detected DCIS and invasive breast cancer. In the southern part of the Netherlands, FFDM screening gradually replaced SFM screening between May 2009 and April 2010. We included a consecutive series of 484, 422 screens obtained between July 2005 and July 2015 and divided these screens into three groups; SFM-only cohort, transition cohort and FFDM-only cohort. A total of 3059 referred women were diagnosed with DCIS (n = 623) or invasive breast cancer (n = 2436). The majority of DCIS were high-grade (48.2%), whereas the majority of the invasive breast cancers were low-grade (45.4%) or intermediate-grade (41.6%). The cancer detection rate (CDR) per 1000 screened women showed the same distribution by grade in both groups. The transition to FFDM was characterised by an increased overall detection rate of invasive cancers. Screening mammography detects mostly high-grade DCIS and low- or intermediate-grade invasive cancers. The grade distribution as well as the CDR in the years after the introduction of FFDM remained stable compared to the era of SFM screening. By diagnosing and treating high-grade DCIS, which otherwise may develop into high-grade invasive carcinoma, our findings provide new evidence for the beneficial value of screening mammography programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 314
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [11] Ernster VL, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1546
  • [12] Hollingsworth A, 2017, CUREUS J MED SCIENCE, V9, DOI 10.7759/cureus.966
  • [13] Breast Cancer Screening Results 5 Years after Introduction of Digital Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    Bluekens, Adriana M.
    Beijerinck, David
    Deurenberg, Jan J.
    Beekman, Matthijs
    Visser, Roelant
    van Engen, Ruben
    Bartels-Kortland, Annemieke
    Broeders, Mireille J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (02) : 353 - 358
  • [14] Discrepant screening mammography assessments at blinded and non-blinded double reading: impact of arbitration by a third reader on screening outcome
    Klompenhouwer, Elisabeth G.
    Voogd, Adri C.
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    Strobbe, Luc J. A.
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C.
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (10) : 2821 - 2829
  • [15] Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: A prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands
    Klompenhouwer, Elisabeth G.
    Voogd, Adri C.
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    Strobbe, Luc J. A.
    de Haan, Anton F. J.
    Wauters, Carla A.
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (03) : 391 - 399
  • [16] Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study
    Nederend, Joost
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    Voogd, Adri C.
    Groenewoud, Johanna H.
    Jansen, Frits H.
    Louwman, Marieke W. J.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (01)
  • [17] Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the dutch performance indicators
    Otten, JDM
    Karssemeijer, N
    Hendriks, JHCL
    Groenewoud, JH
    Fracheboud, J
    Verbeek, ALM
    de Koning, HJ
    Holland, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (10) : 748 - 754
  • [18] Overdiagnosis and overtreatment associated with breast cancer mammography screening: A simulation study with calibration to population-based data
    Seigneurin, Arnaud
    Labarere, Joee
    Francois, Olivier
    Exbrayat, Catherine
    Dupouy, Maylis
    Filippi, Marc
    Colonna, Marc
    [J]. BREAST, 2016, 28 : 60 - 66
  • [19] Re-attendance after false-positive screening mammography: a population-based study in the Netherlands
    Setz-Pels, W.
    Duijm, L. E. M.
    Coebergh, J. W.
    Rutten, M.
    Nederend, J.
    Voogd, A. C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 109 (08) : 2044 - 2050
  • [20] Two-view versus single-view mammography at subsequent screening in a region of the Dutch breast screening programme
    Smallenburg, Vivian van Breest
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    Groenewoud, Johanna H.
    Jansen, Frits H.
    Fracheboud, Jacques
    Plaisier, Menno L.
    van Doorne-Nagtegaal, Heidi J.
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (09) : 2189 - 2194