Trends in incidence and tumour grade in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer

被引:20
作者
Luiten, Jacky D. [1 ,4 ]
Voogd, Adri C. [2 ,3 ]
Luiten, Ernest J. T. [4 ]
Duijm, Lucien E. M. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Univ Med Ctr, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, S Gravendijkwal 230, NL-3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Res Inst GROW, Dept Epidemiol, Utrechtse Singel 40, NL-6229 ER Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Dept Res, Godebaldkwartier 419, NL-3511 DT Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Amphia Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Molengracht 21, NL-4818 CK Breda, Netherlands
[5] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Radiol, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, NL-6532 SZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Dutch Reference Ctr Screening, Wijchenseweg 101, NL-6538 SW Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Invasive breast cancer; Tumour grade; MAMMOGRAPHY; NETHERLANDS; PROGRAM; OVERDIAGNOSIS; OVERTREATMENT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-017-4412-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In a biennial screening mammography programme, we analysed the trends in incidence of screen-detected DCIS and invasive breast cancers in the era of screen-film mammography (SFM) screening, the period of the transition to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) screening and the period of FFDM screening. We also investigated a possible association between the incidence and grading of screen-detected DCIS and invasive breast cancer. In the southern part of the Netherlands, FFDM screening gradually replaced SFM screening between May 2009 and April 2010. We included a consecutive series of 484, 422 screens obtained between July 2005 and July 2015 and divided these screens into three groups; SFM-only cohort, transition cohort and FFDM-only cohort. A total of 3059 referred women were diagnosed with DCIS (n = 623) or invasive breast cancer (n = 2436). The majority of DCIS were high-grade (48.2%), whereas the majority of the invasive breast cancers were low-grade (45.4%) or intermediate-grade (41.6%). The cancer detection rate (CDR) per 1000 screened women showed the same distribution by grade in both groups. The transition to FFDM was characterised by an increased overall detection rate of invasive cancers. Screening mammography detects mostly high-grade DCIS and low- or intermediate-grade invasive cancers. The grade distribution as well as the CDR in the years after the introduction of FFDM remained stable compared to the era of SFM screening. By diagnosing and treating high-grade DCIS, which otherwise may develop into high-grade invasive carcinoma, our findings provide new evidence for the beneficial value of screening mammography programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 314
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, RAD AC BREAST IM REP
  • [2] [Anonymous], MED PHYS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, ACR BIRADS ATLAS BRE
  • [4] Effect of tamoxifen and radiotherapy in women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial
    Cuzick, Jack
    Sestak, Ivana
    Pinder, Sarah E.
    Ellis, Ian O.
    Forsyth, Sharon
    Bundred, Nigel J.
    Forbes, John F.
    Bishop, Hugh
    Fentiman, Ian S.
    George, William D.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2011, 12 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [5] Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: Comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts
    Del Turco, Marco Rosselli
    Mantellini, Paola
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Bonardi, Rita
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Lazzari, Barbara
    Houssami, Nehmat
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (04) : 860 - 866
  • [6] Breast and cervical cancer screening programme implementation in 16 countries
    Dowling, Emily C.
    Klabunde, Carrie
    Patnick, Julietta
    Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2010, 17 (03) : 139 - 146
  • [7] Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Dibden, Amanda
    Michalopoulos, Dimitrios
    Offman, Judith
    Parmar, Dharmishta
    Jenkins, Jacquie
    Collins, Beverley
    Robson, Tony
    Scorfield, Suzanne
    Green, Kathryn
    Hall, Clare
    Liao, Xiao-Hui
    Ryan, Michael
    Johnson, Fiona
    Stevens, Guy
    Kearins, Olive
    Sellars, Sarah
    Patnick, Julietta
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (01) : 109 - 114
  • [8] Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer -: Estimates of overdiagnosis from two trials of mammographic screening for breast cancer
    Duffy, SW
    Agbaje, O
    Tabar, L
    Vitak, B
    Bjurstam, N
    Björneld, L
    Myles, JP
    Warwick, J
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 7 (06) : 258 - 265
  • [9] Mammography screening in the Netherlands: delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer after breast cancer screening
    Duijm, LEM
    Groenewoud, JH
    Jansen, FH
    Fracheboud, J
    van Beek, M
    de Koning, HJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (10) : 1795 - 1799
  • [10] Intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast: morphology, associated risk and molecular biology
    Ellis, Ian O.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 23 : S1 - S7