Characteristics of listener sensitivity to talker-specific phonetic detail

被引:45
作者
Theodore, Rachel M. [1 ]
Miller, Joanne L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Psychol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
VOICE-ONSET-TIME; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; SPEAKING RATE; SPOKEN WORDS; CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCES; RECOGNITION MEMORY; IDENTIFICATION; VARIABILITY; ADAPTATION; CATEGORIES;
D O I
10.1121/1.3467771
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Previous research shows that listeners are sensitive to talker differences in phonetic properties of speech, including voice-onset-time (VOT) in word-initial voiceless stop consonants, and that learning how a talker produces one voiceless stop transfers to another word with the same voiceless stop [Allen, J. S., and Miller, J. L. (2004). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 3171-3183]. The present experiments examined whether transfer extends to words that begin with different voiceless stops. During training, listeners heard two talkers produce a given voiceless-initial word (e.g., pain). VOTs were manipulated such that one talker produced the voiceless stop with relatively short VOTs and the other with relatively long VOTs. At test, listeners heard a short-and long-VOT variant of the same word (e.g., pain) or a word beginning with a different voiceless stop (e.g., cane or coal), and were asked to select which of the two VOT variants was most representative of a given talker. In all conditions, which variant was selected at test was in line with listeners' exposure during training, and the effect was equally strong for the novel word and the training word. These findings suggest that accommodating talker-specific phonetic detail does not require exposure to each individual phonetic segment. (C) 2010 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10.1121/1.3467771]
引用
收藏
页码:2090 / 2099
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time [J].
Allen, JS ;
Miller, JL .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 115 (06) :3171-3183
[2]   Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time [J].
Allen, JS ;
Miller, JL ;
DeSteno, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 113 (01) :544-552
[3]   Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: A distinction between lexical status and speaking rate [J].
Allen, JS ;
Miller, JL .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2001, 63 (05) :798-810
[4]  
Boersma P., 2013, Praat: doing phonetics by computer, DOI DOI 10.1097/AUD.0B013E31821473F7
[5]   Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech [J].
Bradlow, Ann R. ;
Bent, Tessa .
COGNITION, 2008, 106 (02) :707-729
[6]   Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors [J].
Bradlow, AR ;
Pisoni, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 106 (04) :2074-2085
[7]   Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages [J].
Cho, T ;
Ladefoged, P .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 1999, 27 (02) :207-229
[8]   PERCEPTUAL SPECIFICITY OF AUDITORY PRIMING - IMPLICIT MEMORY FOR VOICE INTONATION AND FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY [J].
CHURCH, BA ;
SCHACTER, DL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1994, 20 (03) :521-533
[9]   Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English [J].
Clarke, CM ;
Garrett, MF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 116 (06) :3647-3658
[10]   ACOUSTIC LOCI AND TRANSITIONAL CUES FOR CONSONANTS [J].
DELATTRE, PC ;
LIBERMAN, AM ;
COOPER, FS .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1955, 27 (04) :769-773