Planning agents in JAMES

被引:32
|
作者
Schattenberg, B [1 ]
Uhrmacher, AM
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Fac Comp Sci, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Dept Comp Sci, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
关键词
multiagent systems; planning; simulation; test beds; testing;
D O I
10.1109/5.910852
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Testing is an obligatory step in developing multiagent systems. For testing multiagent systems in virtual, dynamic environments, simulation systems are required that support a modular, declarative construction of experimental frames, that facilitate the embeddence of a variety of agent architectures and that allow an efficient parallel, distributed execution. We introduce the system JAMES (A Java-based agent modeling environment for simulation). In JAMES, agents and their dynamic environment are modeled as reflective, time-triggered state automata. its possibilities to compose experimental frames based on predefined components, to express temporal, interdependencies, to capture the phenomenon of proactiveness and reflectivity of agents are illuminated by experiments with planning agents. The underlying planning system is a general-purpose pose system, about which no empirical results exist besides traditional static benchmark tests. We analyze the interplay between heuristics for selecting goals, viewing range, commitment strategies, explorativeness, and trust in the persistence of the world and uncover properties of the agent, the planning engine, and the chosen test scenario: TILEWORLD.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 173
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complexity of planning for connected agents
    Charrier, Tristan
    Queffelec, Arthur
    Sankur, Ocan
    Schwarzentruber, Francois
    AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 34 (02)
  • [2] Complexity of planning for connected agents
    Tristan Charrier
    Arthur Queffelec
    Ocan Sankur
    François Schwarzentruber
    Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2020, 34
  • [3] Monitoring agents using declarative planning
    Dix, JG
    Eiter, T
    Fink, M
    Polleres, A
    Zhang, YQ
    KI 2003: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2003, 2821 : 646 - 660
  • [4] Monitoring agents using declarative planning
    Dix, J
    Eiter, T
    Fink, M
    Polleres, A
    Zhang, YQ
    FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2003, 57 (2-4) : 345 - 370
  • [5] Opportunism in planning agents
    Lawton, JH
    7TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL XII, PROCEEDINGS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS, TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS: II, 2003, : 496 - 501
  • [6] Cooperating agents for planning and scheduling
    Frankovic, B
    Dang, TT
    MANUFACTURING, MODELLING, MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL 2001 (MIM 2001), 2001, : 7 - 12
  • [7] Planning control rules for reactive agents
    Kabanza, F
    Barbeau, M
    StDenis, R
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 95 (01) : 67 - 113
  • [8] Goal Setting and Behavior Planning for Cognitive Agents
    Panov, A. I.
    SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2019, 46 (06) : 404 - 415
  • [9] Planning on an Empty Stomach: On Agents with Projection Bias
    Oren, Sigal
    Sklar, Nadav
    WEB AND INTERNET ECONOMICS, WINE 2021, 2022, 13112 : 410 - 427
  • [10] Goal Setting and Behavior Planning for Cognitive Agents
    A. I. Panov
    Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 2019, 46 : 404 - 415