Blend Composition Dependence of the Compatibilizing Efficiency of Graft Copolymers for Immiscible Polymer Blends

被引:22
作者
Zhang, Cai-Liang [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Lian-Fang [1 ]
Gu, Xue-Ping [1 ,2 ]
Hoppe, Sandrine [2 ]
Hu, Guo-Hua [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, State Key Lab Chem Engn, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Nancy Univ, CNRS ENSIC INPL, Lab Chem Engn Sci, F-54001 Nancy, France
[3] Maison Univ, Inst Univ France, F-75005 Paris, France
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
BLOCK-COPOLYMERS; MOLECULAR ARCHITECTURE; INTERFACIAL MODIFICATION; ANIONIC-POLYMERIZATION; EPSILON-CAPROLACTAM; TENSILE PROPERTIES; PHASE MORPHOLOGY; WEIGHT; AGENTS; COMB;
D O I
10.1002/pen.21715
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This work is concerned with the dependence of the compatibilizing efficiency of graft copolymers on the composition of immiscible polymer blends. A series of graft copolymers of polystyrene (PS) and polyamide 6 (PA6), denoted as PS-g-PA6, with different molecular structures were used as compatibilizers. The PS-g-PA6 was more efficient for the PS/PA6 (80/20) blend than for the PS/PA6 (20/80) one, indicating that a graft copolymer whose backbone and grafts match the matrix and the disperse phase polymers, respectively, has higher compatibilizing efficiency. This is in disagreement with the literature. Moreover, whatever the blend composition, for PS-g-PA6 graft copolymers with the same backbone and the same number of grafts per backbone, the longer the grafts, the higher their compatibilizing and stabilizing efficiency; for a given backbone/graft mass ratio, the longer the grafts and concomitantly the smaller the number of grafts per backbone, the higher the compatibilizing and stabilizing efficiency of the graft copolymer. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 50:2243-2251,2010. (C) 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers
引用
收藏
页码:2243 / 2251
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Effect of exothermic interfacial mixing on interfacial activity of a block copolymer [J].
Adedeji, A ;
Hudson, SD ;
Jamieson, AM .
MACROMOLECULES, 1996, 29 (07) :2449-2456
[2]  
Bourry D, 1998, J POLYM SCI POL PHYS, V36, P1889, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199808)36:11<1889::AID-POLB10>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-3
[4]  
Brandrup J., 1999, Polymer Handbook, VII
[5]   Effect of diblock copolymers on morphology and mechanical properties for syndiotactic polystyrene/ethylene-propylene copolymer blends [J].
Choi, WM ;
Park, OO ;
Lim, JG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2004, 91 (06) :3618-3626
[6]  
Cigana P, 1996, J POLYM SCI POL PHYS, V34, P1691, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19960715)34:9<1691::AID-POLB18>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-2
[8]   The relative efficacy of diblock and triblock copolymers for a polystyrene/ethylene-propylene rubber interface [J].
Cigana, P ;
Favis, BD .
POLYMER, 1998, 39 (15) :3373-3378
[9]   The role of polymer architecture in strengthening polymer-polymer interfaces: A comparison of graft, block, and random copolymers containing hydrogen-bonding moieties [J].
Edgecombe, BD ;
Stein, JA ;
Frechet, JMJ ;
Xu, ZH ;
Kramer, EJ .
MACROMOLECULES, 1998, 31 (04) :1292-1304
[10]   Compatibilization effect of graft copolymer on immiscible polymer blends: 1. LLDPE/SBS/LLDPE-g-PS systems [J].
Feng, HQ ;
Ye, CH ;
Tian, J ;
Feng, ZL ;
Huang, BT .
POLYMER, 1998, 39 (10) :1787-1792