Right ventricular stimulation threshold at ICD implant predicts device therapy in primary prevention patients with ischaemic heart disease

被引:3
作者
Atary, Jael Z. [1 ]
Borleffs, C. Jan Willem [1 ]
van der Bom, Johanna G. [2 ]
Trines, Serge A. I. P. [1 ]
Bootsma, Marianne [1 ]
Zeppenfeld, Katja [1 ]
van Erven, Lieselot [1 ]
Schalij, Martin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Leiden, Netherlands
来源
EUROPACE | 2010年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Primary prevention; Sudden cardiac death; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; RISK-STRATIFICATION; EJECTION FRACTION; ATRIAL CONDUCTION; DYSFUNCTION; ARRHYTHMIAS; TACHYCARDIA; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euq266
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Myocardial excitability is known (amongst other reasons) to be related to the degree of ischaemia, contractile dysfunction and heart failure. It was hypothesized that the right ventricular (RV) stimulation threshold has prognostic value with respect to the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and patient survival in recipients of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Ischaemic heart disease patients receiving an ICD at Leiden University Medical Center as primary prevention for sudden cardiac death were included in this study. Right ventricular thresholds were determined at ICD implant. Data were collected on VAs triggering ICD therapy and on all-cause mortality. A total of 689 consecutive patients were included (87% male, age 63 +/- 11 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 29 +/- 11%) and followed for a median of 28 months. Post-implant RV-threshold was 0.7 +/- 0.5 volt (V) at 0.5 ms pulse duration. Best dichotomous separation was reached at a cut-off of 1 V. During follow-up, 167 (24%) patients received appropriate ICD therapy, 88 (13%) had appropriate shocks and 134 (19%) died. Cumulative appropriate shock incidence for patients with RV threshold >= 1 V (n = 166) was 16% at 1 year, 24% at 3 years and 34% at 5 years compared with 4, 11 and 17% for patients with an RV-threshold < 1 V (n = 523). Adjusted hazard ratio of RV threshold >= 1 V was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.4-2.9) for appropriate therapy, 3.3 (95% CI: 2.0-5.4) for appropriate shocks and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1-2.5) for mortality. The RV stimulation threshold at ICD implant has a strong independent prognostic value for the occurrence of VAs triggering appropriate ICD therapy, appropriate shocks and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:1581 / 1588
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [11] American heart Association/American college of cardiology Foundation/Heart rhythm society scientific statement on Noninvasive risk stratification techniques for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death - A scientific statement from the American heart association council on clinical cardiology committee on electrocardiography and arrhythmias and council on epidemiology and prevention
    Goldberger, Jeffrey J.
    Cain, Michael E.
    Hohnloser, Stefan H.
    Kadish, Alan H.
    Knight, Bradley P.
    Lauer, Michael S.
    Maron, Barry J.
    Page, Richard L.
    Passman, Rod S.
    Stevenson, William G.
    Zipes, Douglas P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (14) : 1179 - 1199
  • [12] Risk stratification for primary implantation of a Cardioverter-Defibrillator in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction
    Goldenberg, Ilan
    Vyas, Anant K.
    Hall, W. Jackson
    Moss, Arthur J.
    Wang, Hongyue
    He, Hua
    Zareba, Wojciech
    McNitt, Scott
    Andrews, Mark L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 51 (03) : 288 - 296
  • [13] Relations among renal function, risk of sudden cardiac death, and benefit of the implanted with ischemic left cardiac defibrillator in patients ventricular dysfunction
    Goldenberg, Ilan
    Moss, Arthur J.
    McNitt, Scott
    Zareba, Wojciech
    Andrews, Mark L.
    Hall, W. Jackson
    Greenberg, Henry
    Case, Robert B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 98 (04) : 485 - 490
  • [14] Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction
    Hohnloser, SH
    Kuck, KH
    Dorian, P
    Roberts, RS
    Hampton, JR
    Hatala, R
    Fain, E
    Gent, M
    Connolly, SJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (24) : 2481 - 2488
  • [15] Kay GN, 2005, CARDIAC PACING AND ICDS, 4TH EDITION, P47
  • [16] La Rovere MT, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P2072
  • [17] PROLONGED ATRIAL CONDUCTION - MAJOR PREDISPOSING FACTOR FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ATRIAL-FLUTTER
    LEIER, CV
    MEACHAM, JA
    SCHAAL, SF
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1978, 57 (02) : 213 - 216
  • [18] Risk stratification of patients with prior myocardial infarction and advanced left ventricular dysfunction by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging
    Morishima, Itsuro
    Sone, Takahito
    Tsuboi, Hideyuki
    Mukawa, Hiroaki
    Uesugi, Michitaka
    Morikawa, Shuji
    Takagi, Kensuke
    Niwa, Toru
    Morita, Yasuhiro
    Murakami, Ryuichiro
    Numaguchi, Yasushi
    Murohara, Toyoaki
    Okumura, Kenji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (05) : 631 - 637
  • [19] Long-term clinical course of patients after termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by an implanted defibrillator
    Moss, AJ
    Greenberg, H
    Case, RB
    Zareba, W
    Hall, WJ
    Brown, MW
    Daubert, JP
    McNitt, S
    Andrews, ML
    Elkin, AD
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (25) : 3760 - 3765
  • [20] Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia
    Moss, AJ
    Hall, WJ
    Cannom, DS
    Daubert, JP
    Higgins, SL
    Klein, H
    Levine, JH
    Saksena, S
    Waldo, AL
    Wilber, D
    Brown, MW
    Heo, M
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (26) : 1933 - 1940