Right ventricular stimulation threshold at ICD implant predicts device therapy in primary prevention patients with ischaemic heart disease

被引:3
作者
Atary, Jael Z. [1 ]
Borleffs, C. Jan Willem [1 ]
van der Bom, Johanna G. [2 ]
Trines, Serge A. I. P. [1 ]
Bootsma, Marianne [1 ]
Zeppenfeld, Katja [1 ]
van Erven, Lieselot [1 ]
Schalij, Martin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Leiden, Netherlands
来源
EUROPACE | 2010年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Primary prevention; Sudden cardiac death; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; RISK-STRATIFICATION; EJECTION FRACTION; ATRIAL CONDUCTION; DYSFUNCTION; ARRHYTHMIAS; TACHYCARDIA; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euq266
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Myocardial excitability is known (amongst other reasons) to be related to the degree of ischaemia, contractile dysfunction and heart failure. It was hypothesized that the right ventricular (RV) stimulation threshold has prognostic value with respect to the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and patient survival in recipients of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Ischaemic heart disease patients receiving an ICD at Leiden University Medical Center as primary prevention for sudden cardiac death were included in this study. Right ventricular thresholds were determined at ICD implant. Data were collected on VAs triggering ICD therapy and on all-cause mortality. A total of 689 consecutive patients were included (87% male, age 63 +/- 11 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 29 +/- 11%) and followed for a median of 28 months. Post-implant RV-threshold was 0.7 +/- 0.5 volt (V) at 0.5 ms pulse duration. Best dichotomous separation was reached at a cut-off of 1 V. During follow-up, 167 (24%) patients received appropriate ICD therapy, 88 (13%) had appropriate shocks and 134 (19%) died. Cumulative appropriate shock incidence for patients with RV threshold >= 1 V (n = 166) was 16% at 1 year, 24% at 3 years and 34% at 5 years compared with 4, 11 and 17% for patients with an RV-threshold < 1 V (n = 523). Adjusted hazard ratio of RV threshold >= 1 V was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.4-2.9) for appropriate therapy, 3.3 (95% CI: 2.0-5.4) for appropriate shocks and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1-2.5) for mortality. The RV stimulation threshold at ICD implant has a strong independent prognostic value for the occurrence of VAs triggering appropriate ICD therapy, appropriate shocks and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:1581 / 1588
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [2] Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure
    Bardy, GH
    Lee, KL
    Mark, DB
    Poole, JE
    Packer, DL
    Boineau, R
    Domanski, M
    Troutman, C
    Anderson, J
    Johnson, G
    McNulty, SE
    Clapp-Channing, N
    Davidson-Ray, LD
    Fraulo, ES
    Fishbein, DP
    Luceri, RM
    Ip, JH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (03) : 225 - 237
  • [3] SLOW VENTRICULAR ACTIVATION IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - SOURCE OF REENTRANT PREMATURE VENTRICULAR CONTRACTIONS
    BOINEAU, JP
    COX, JL
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1973, 48 (04) : 702 - 713
  • [4] ATRIAL CONDUCTION - EFFECTS OF EXTRASTIMULI WITH AND WITHOUT ATRIAL DYSRHYTHMIAS
    BUXTON, AE
    WAXMAN, HL
    MARCHLINSKI, FE
    JOSEPHSON, ME
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1984, 54 (07) : 755 - 761
  • [6] Cohen Richard J, 2003, Card Electrophysiol Rev, V7, P438, DOI 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023161.35685.68
  • [7] Predictive value of ventricular arrhythmia inducibility for subsequent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II patients
    Daubert, JP
    Zareba, W
    Hall, WJ
    Schuger, C
    Corsello, A
    Leon, AR
    Andrews, ML
    McNitt, S
    Huang, DT
    Moss, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (01) : 98 - 107
  • [8] Dohrmann M L, 1985, Cardiol Clin, V3, P527
  • [9] ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
    Epstein, Andrew E.
    DiMarco, John P.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Estes, N. A. Mark, III
    Freedman, Roger A.
    Gettes, Leonard S.
    Gillinov, A. Marc
    Gregoratos, Gabriel
    Hammill, Stephen C.
    Hayes, David L.
    Hlatky, Mark A.
    Newby, L. Kristin
    Page, Richard L.
    Schoenfeld, Mark H.
    Silka, Michael J.
    Stevenson, Lynne Warner
    Sweeney, Michael O.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2008, 117 (21) : E350 - E408
  • [10] FURMAN S, 2009, PRACTICE CARDIAC PAC, P68