Chronic spinal pain - A randomized clinical trial comparing medication, acupuncture, and spinal manipulation

被引:121
作者
Giles, LGF
Muller, R
机构
[1] James Cook Univ N Queensland, Townsville Hosp, Natl Unit Multidisciplinary Studies Spinal Pain, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ N Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[3] James Cook Univ N Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
关键词
acupuncture; chiropractic spinal manipulation; clinical trial; medicine; spine;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200307150-00003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Objective. To compare medication, needle acupuncture, and spinal manipulation for managing chronic (>13 weeks duration) spinal pain because the value of medicinal and popular forms of alternative care for chronic spinal pain syndromes is uncertain. Summary of Background Data. Between February 1999 and October 2001, 115 patients without contraindication for the three treatment regimens were enrolled at the public hospital's multidisciplinary spinal pain unit. Methods. One of three separate intervention protocols was used: medication, needle acupuncture, or chiropractic spinal manipulation. Patients were assessed before treatment by a sports medical physician for exclusion criteria and by a research assistant using the Oswestry Back Pain Disability Index (Oswestry), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the Short-Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), visual analog scales (VAS) of pain intensity and ranges of movement. These instruments were administered again at 2, 5, and 9 weeks after the beginning of treatment. Results. Randomization proved to be successful. The highest proportion of early (asymptomatic status) recovery was found for manipulation (27.3%), followed by acupuncture (9.4%) and medication (5%). Manipulation achieved the best overall results with improvements of 50% (P=0.01) on the Oswestry scale, 38% (P=0.08) on the NDI 47% (P<0.001) on the SF-36, and 50% (P<0.01) on the VAS, for back pain, 38% (P<0.001) for lumbar standing flexion, 20%, (P<0.001) for lumbar sitting flexion, 25% (P=0.1) for,cervical sitting flexion, and 18% (P=0.02) for cervical sitting extension. However, on the VAS for neck pain, acupuncture, showed a better result than. manipulation (50% vs 42%). Conclusions. The consistency of the results provides, despite some discussed shortcomings of this study, evidence that in patients with chronic spinal pain, manipulation, if notcontraindicated, results in greater short-term improvement than acupuncture or medication. However, the data do not strongly support the use of only manipulation, only acupuncture, or only nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for the treatment of chronic spinal pain. The results from this exploratory study need confirmation from future larger studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1490 / 1502
页数:13
相关论文
共 96 条
[21]  
DEYO RA, 1991, ADULT SPINE, P1567
[22]   Relationship between pain and vertebral motion in chronic low-back pain subjects [J].
Dickey, JP ;
Pierrynowski, MR ;
Bednar, DA ;
Yang, SX .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (05) :345-352
[23]   Acupuncture for back pain - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Ernst, E ;
White, AR .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (20) :2235-2241
[24]  
ERNST E, 1995, J ROY SOC MED, V88, P244
[25]   Experts' opinions on complementary/alternative therapies for low back pain [J].
Ernst, E ;
Pittler, MH .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 22 (02) :87-90
[26]  
ERNST E, 1999, ACUPUNCTURE SCI APPR, P107
[27]   Is acupuncture effective for the treatment of chronic pain? A systematic review [J].
Ezzo, J ;
Berman, B ;
Hadhazy, VA ;
Jadad, AR ;
Lao, LX ;
Singh, BB .
PAIN, 2000, 86 (03) :217-225
[28]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271
[29]   Functional rating index - A new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions [J].
Feise, RJ ;
Menke, JM .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (01) :78-86
[30]   ACUTE BACK PAIN - A CONTROL-GROUP COMPARISON OF BEHAVIORAL VS TRADITIONAL MANAGEMENT METHODS [J].
FORDYCE, WE ;
BROCKWAY, JA ;
BERGMAN, JA ;
SPENGLER, D .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1986, 9 (02) :127-140