Conversion of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) for Biliary Reflux Resistant to Medical Treatment: Lessons Learned from a Retrospective Series of 2780 Consecutive Patients Undergoing OAGB

被引:51
|
作者
Kassir, Radwan [1 ]
Petrucciani, Niccolo [2 ]
Debs, Tarek [3 ]
Juglard, Gildas [4 ]
Martini, Francesco [4 ]
Liagre, Arnaud [4 ]
机构
[1] CHU Felix Guyon, Dept Digest Surg, St Denis, La Reunion, France
[2] Sapienza Univ, Dept Med & Surg Sci & Translat Med, Fac Med & Psychol, St Andrea Hosp, Via Grottarossa 1035-9, I-00189 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Nice Sophia Antipolis, Archet Hosp 2, Dept Digest Surg, Nice, France
[4] Clin Cedres 31, Dept Bariatr Surg, Cornebarrieu, France
关键词
Bariatric surgery; One anastomosis gastric bypass; Postoperative complications; Bile reflux; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Revision; Surgical; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; LAPAROSCOPIC CONVERSION; BARIATRIC SURGERY; SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; REMISSION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-020-04460-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Biliary reflux resistant to medical treatment has an incidence of 0.6-10% after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and may be a reason for revisional surgery. The aim of this study is to report the results of a single-institution series of patients who underwent conversion from OAGB to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for biliary reflux. Methods Data of OAGB patients converted to RYGB between May 2010 and December 2017 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The afferent limb was sectioned proximally to the gastrojejunal anastomosis. A jejuno-jejunal latero-lateral anastomosis was performed between the biliary and alimentary limb. The final RYGB had an alimentary limb of 100 cm and a biliary limb of 150 cm. Results During the study period, 2780 patients underwent OAGB. A total of 32 patients (1.2%) underwent conversion from OAGB to RYGB for biliary reflux, at a mean of 30.3 months from OAGB. Mean weight before RYGB was 70.6 kg, and mean body mass index BMI was 26 kg/m(2). Four patients experienced postoperative complications (12.5%). Patients' mean weight was 74.3 kg at 24 months follow-up, with BMI of 27.2 kg/m(2). Conversion to RYGB relieved symptoms of biliary reflux in all patients but 2 (93.8%). Conclusions Biliary reflux although rare can complicate OAGB. RYGB is a safe and feasible technique of revision in this case. A shorter length of the afferent limb during the initial operation facilitates the revision.
引用
收藏
页码:2093 / 2098
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conversion of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) for Biliary Reflux Resistant to Medical Treatment: Lessons Learned from a Retrospective Series of 2780 Consecutive Patients Undergoing OAGB
    Radwan Kassir
    Niccolo Petrucciani
    Tarek Debs
    Gildas Juglard
    Francesco Martini
    Arnaud Liagre
    Obesity Surgery, 2020, 30 : 2093 - 2098
  • [2] Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): who is more at risk? A multicenter study
    Carandina, Sergio
    Soprani, Antoine
    Sista, Federico
    De Palma, Massimiliano
    Murcia, Sebastien
    Sartori, Andrea
    Silvia, Ferro
    Nedelcu, Anamaria
    Zulian, Viola
    Nedelcu, Marius
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (02): : 857 - 871
  • [3] One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)-a Mid-Term Cohort Study with 612 Patients
    Rheinwalt, Karl P.
    Plamper, Andreas
    Rueckbeil, Marcia, V
    Kroh, Andreas
    Neumann, Ulf P.
    Ulmer, Tom F.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2020, 30 (04) : 1230 - 1240
  • [4] Internal Hernia After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): Lessons Learned from a Retrospective Series of 3368 Consecutive Patients Undergoing OAGB with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 150 cm
    Petrucciani, Niccolo
    Martini, Francesco
    Kassir, Radwan
    Juglard, Gildas
    Hamid, Celine
    Boudrie, Hubert
    Van Haverbeke, Olivier
    Liagre, Arnaud
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (06) : 2537 - 2544
  • [5] Internal Hernia After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): Lessons Learned from a Retrospective Series of 3368 Consecutive Patients Undergoing OAGB with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 150 cm
    Niccolo Petrucciani
    Francesco Martini
    Radwan Kassir
    Gildas Juglard
    Celine Hamid
    Hubert Boudrie
    Olivier Van Haverbeke
    Arnaud Liagre
    Obesity Surgery, 2021, 31 : 2537 - 2544
  • [6] Comparative study of midterm outcomes between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), diverted one-anastomosis gastric bypass (D-OAGB), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB)
    El Masry, Mohamed Abdul Moneim
    Rahman, Islam Abdul
    Elshal, Mohamed Fathy Mahmoud
    Moneim, Ahmed Maher Abdul
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2024, 409 (01)
  • [7] Laparoscopic Conversion of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Chronic Bile Reflux
    Facchiano, Enrico
    Leuratti, Luca
    Veltri, Marco
    Lucchese, Marcello
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2016, 26 (03) : 701 - 703
  • [8] Laparoscopic Conversion of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) to Long-Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Due Weight Regain and Bile Reflux
    Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi
    Nariman Mehrnia
    Fahime Yarigholi
    Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri
    Obesity Surgery, 2024, 34 : 698 - 699
  • [9] Laparoscopic Conversion of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) to Long-Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Due Weight Regain and Bile Reflux
    Jazi, Amir Hossein Davarpanah
    Mehrnia, Nariman
    Yarigholi, Fahime
    Shahmiri, Shahab Shahabi
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (02) : 509 - 514
  • [10] Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): who is more at risk? A multicenter study
    Sergio Carandina
    Antoine Soprani
    Federico Sista
    Massimiliano De Palma
    Sebastien Murcia
    Andrea Sartori
    Ferro Silvia
    Anamaria Nedelcu
    Viola Zulian
    Marius Nedelcu
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38 : 1163 - 1169