Comparative study between 1.5 and 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI systems using the PIRADS version 2 classification in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

被引:4
作者
Rodriguez Cabello, Miguel Angel [1 ]
Mendez Rubio, Santiago [1 ]
Moraga Sanz, Alvaro [1 ]
Sanz Miguelanez, Juan Luis [1 ]
Vazquez Alba, David [1 ]
Aullo Gonzalez, Carolina [2 ]
Platas Sancho, Arturo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ La Moraleja, Serv Urol, Avda Francisco Pi y Margall 81, Madrid 28050, Spain
[2] Univ Francisco de Vitoria, Hosp Univ La Moraleja, Serv Radiodiagnost, Avda Francisco Pi y Margall 81, Madrid 28050, Spain
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2022年 / 75卷 / 04期
关键词
Multiparametric prostatic MRI (mpMRI); 1.5-Tesla; 3-Tesla; Prostate cancer; PIRADS; ACCURACY; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20227504.47
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The 3-Tesla multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) system represents a diagnostic advance for prostate cancer. Our aim is to demonstrate that the results in 1.5-Tesla mpMRI are not inferior compared to the 3-Tesla for the correct diagnosis of prostate cancer. Material and methods: Non-inferiority comparative cross-sectional study between fusion-guided prostate biopsy results. 344 patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (elevated PSA and/or suspicious DRE) and mpMRI interpreted and verified by the same radiologists in all cases, 270 in 1.5-Tesla and 74 in 3-Tesla, with at least one lesion PIRADSv2 >= 3. Exclusion criteria were positive biopsy or previous prostate treatment. We consider malignancy as ISUP >= 1 and significant tumor as ISUP >= 2. We used Wilcoxon and t-student test (central tendency measures), diagnostic test (gold standard: ISUP of targeted biopsy), Chi2 test and Z-test (comparison of prevalences and 95%CI malignancy and significant tumor according to mpMRI). Results: Median prostate volume 50cc(IQR:33.5) and PSA 6.11ng/ml(IQR:3.39). Mean age 67.4 +/- 8.1years. Number of suspicious lesions/patient: mpMRI 1.3 (1.5-Tesla) and 1.5 (3-Tesla). No differences were found between mpMRI (homogeneous and comparable samples). 57% (1.5-Tesla) vs 66% (3-Tesla) of targeted biopsies were malignant, and 34%vs38% were significant tumor, with no significant differences. Se, Sp, PPV and NPV for malignancy (1.5-Tesla vs 3-Tesla) were 96%vs90%, 38%vs44%, 67%vs76%, and 86%vs69%, with no significant differences. Conclusions: There are no significant differences between 1.5-Tesla vs 3-Tesla mpMRI regarding targeted biopsy results. Not to have 3-Tesla mpMRI may not be a limitation to use 1.5-Tesla as a diagnostic test for the better diagnosis of prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 338
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In-parallel comparative evaluation between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, prostate cancer antigen 3 and the prostate health index in predicting pathologically confirmed significant prostate cancer in men eligible for active surveillance
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Cantiello, Francesco
    De Luca, Stefano
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Veltri, Andrea
    Russo, Filippo
    Sottile, Antonino
    Damiano, Rocco
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (04) : 527 - 534
  • [42] Three Tesla Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison of Performance with and without Endorectal Coil for Prostate Cancer Detection, PI-RADS™ version 2 Category and Staging with Whole Mount Histopathology Correlation
    Mirak, Sohrab Afshari
    Shakeri, Sepideh
    Bajgiran, Amirhossein Mohammadian
    Felker, Ely R.
    Sung, Kyung Hyun
    Asvadi, Nazanin Hajarol
    Khoshnoodi, Pooria
    Markovic, Daniela
    Ponzini, Danielle
    Ahuja, Preeti
    Sisk, Anthony
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Lu, David
    Raman, Steven S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (03) : 496 - 502
  • [43] Quality Comparison of 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI of the prostate using a flexible surface receiver coil versus conventional surface coil plus endorectal coil setup
    Ullrich, T.
    Kohli, M. D.
    Ohliger, M. A.
    Magudia, K.
    Arora, S. S.
    Barrett, T.
    Bittencourt, L. K.
    Margolis, D. J.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    Turkbey, B.
    Westphalen, A. C.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (12) : 4260 - 4270
  • [44] Quality Comparison of 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI of the prostate using a flexible surface receiver coil versus conventional surface coil plus endorectal coil setup
    T. Ullrich
    M. D. Kohli
    M. A. Ohliger
    K. Magudia
    S. S. Arora
    T. Barrett
    L. K. Bittencourt
    D. J. Margolis
    L. Schimmöller
    B. Turkbey
    A. C. Westphalen
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 4260 - 4270
  • [45] Deep learning model for the detection of prostate cancer and classification of clinically significant disease using multiparametric MRI in comparison to PI-RADs score
    Yang, Chunguang
    Li, Basen
    Luan, Yang
    Wang, Shiwei
    Bian, Yang
    Zhang, Junbiao
    Wang, Zefeng
    Liu, Bo
    Chen, Xin
    Hacker, Marcus
    Li, Zhen
    Li, Xiang
    Wang, Zhihua
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 (05) : 158.e17 - 158.e27
  • [46] Impact of Scanner Manufacturer, Endorectal Coil Use, and Clinical Variables on Deep Learning-assisted Prostate Cancer Classification Using Multiparametric MRI
    de Almeida, Jose Guilherme
    Rodrigues, Nuno M.
    Verde, Ana Sofia Castro
    Bilreiro, Carlos
    Ip, Joana
    Matos, Celso
    Silva, Sara
    Tsiknakis, Manolis
    Marias, Kostantinos
    Regge, Daniele
    Papanikolaou, Nikolaos
    RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2025, 7 (03)
  • [47] The diagnostic value of PI-RADS V1 and V2 using multiparametric MRI in transition zone prostate clinical cancer
    Wang, Ximing
    Bao, Jie
    Ping, Xiaoxia
    Hu, Chunhong
    Hou, Jianquan
    Dong, Fenglin
    Guo, Lingchuan
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 16 (03) : 3201 - 3206
  • [48] Transperineal freehand multiparametric MRI fusion targeted biopsies under local anaesthesia for prostate cancer diagnosis: a multicentre prospective study of 1014 cases
    Marra, Giancarlo
    Zhuang, Junlong
    Beltrami, Mattia
    Calleris, Giorgio
    Zhao, Xiaozhi
    Marquis, Alessandro
    Kan, Yansheng
    Oderda, Marco
    Huang, Haifeng
    Faletti, Riccardo
    Zhang, Qing
    Molinaro, Luca
    Wang, Wei
    Bergamasco, Laura
    Guo, Hongqian
    Gontero, Paolo
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 127 (01) : 122 - 130
  • [49] Characterization and PI-RADS version 2 assessment of prostate cancers missed by prebiopsy 3-T multiparametric MRI: Correlation with whole-mount thin-section histopathology
    Park, Kye Jin
    Kim, Mi-hyun
    Kim, Jeong Kon
    Cho, Kyoung-Sik
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2019, 55 : 174 - 180
  • [50] Validation of PI-RADS v.2 for prostate cancer diagnosis with MRI at 3T using an external phased-array coil
    Baldisserotto, Matteo
    Dornelles Neto, Eurico J.
    Carvalhal, Gustavo
    de Toledo, Aloyso F.
    de Almeida, Clovis M.
    Cairoli, Carlos E. D.
    de Silva, Daniel O.
    Carvalhal, Eduardo
    Paganin, Ricardo P.
    Agra, Alexandre
    de Santos, Francisco S.
    Noronha, Jorge A. P.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (05) : 1354 - 1359