The articulation of integration of clinical and basic sciences in concept maps: differences between experienced and resident groups

被引:10
|
作者
Vink, Sylvia [1 ]
van Tartwijk, Jan [2 ]
Verloop, Nico [1 ]
Gosselink, Manon [3 ]
Driessen, Erik [4 ]
Bolk, Jan [5 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, ICLON, Wassenaarseweg 62A, NL-2333 AL Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Teaching & Learning Educ Dev & Training, Fac Social & Behav Sci, POB 80-140, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] PSYVEL, Straatweg 94, NL-3051 BL Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Dept Educ Dev & Res, Tongersestr 53, NL-6211 LM Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, POB 9600, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Concept mapping; Curriculum development; Teacher learning; Integration of clinical and basic sciences; Expertise differences; Knowledge elicitation; CONCEPT MAPPING ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE MAPS; CURRICULUM; STUDENTS; TOOL; PHYSIOLOGY; EXPERTISE;
D O I
10.1007/s10459-015-9657-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
To determine the content of integrated curricula, clinical concepts and the underlying basic science concepts need to be made explicit. Preconstructed concept maps are recommended for this purpose. They are mainly constructed by experts. However, concept maps constructed by residents are hypothesized to be less complex, to reveal more tacit basic science concepts and these basic science concepts are expected to be used for the organization of the maps. These hypotheses are derived from studies about knowledge development of individuals. However, integrated curricula require a high degree of cooperation between clinicians and basic scientists. This study examined whether there are consistent variations regarding the articulation of integration when groups of experienced clinicians and basic scientists and groups of residents and basic scientists-in-training construct concept maps. Seven groups of three clinicians and basic scientists on experienced level and seven such groups on resident level constructed concept maps illuminating clinical problems. They were guided by instructions that focused them on articulation of integration. The concept maps were analysed by features that described integration. Descriptive statistics showed consistent variations between the two expertise levels. The concept maps of the resident groups exceeded those of the experienced groups in articulated integration. First, they used significantly more links between clinical and basic science concepts. Second, these links connected basic science concepts with a greater variety of clinical concepts than the experienced groups. Third, although residents did not use significantly more basic science concepts, they used them significantly more frequent to organize the clinical concepts. The conclusion was drawn that not all hypotheses could be confirmed and that the resident concept maps were more elaborate than expected. This article discusses the implications for the role that residents and basic scientists-in-training might play in the construction of preconstructed concept maps and the development of integrated curricula.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 657
页数:15
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] The articulation of integration of clinical and basic sciences in concept maps: differences between experienced and resident groups
    Sylvia Vink
    Jan van Tartwijk
    Nico Verloop
    Manon Gosselink
    Erik Driessen
    Jan Bolk
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2016, 21 : 643 - 657
  • [2] Integration of clinical and basic sciences in concept maps: a mixed-method study on teacher learning
    Vink, Sylvia C.
    Van Tartwijk, Jan
    Bolk, Jan
    Verloop, Nico
    NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 10
  • [3] Integration of clinical and basic sciences in concept maps: a mixed-method study on teacher learning
    Vink, Sylvia C.
    Van Tartwijk, Jan
    Bolk, Jan
    Verloop, Nico
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 15
  • [4] Integration of clinical and basic sciences in concept maps: a mixed-method study on teacher learning
    Sylvia C Vink
    Jan Van Tartwijk
    Jan Bolk
    Nico Verloop
    BMC Medical Education, 15
  • [5] Integration of Basic and Clinical Sciences: Student Perceptions
    Dharini van der Hoeven
    Liang Zhu
    Kamal Busaidy
    Ryan L. Quock
    J. Nathaniel Holland
    Ransome van der Hoeven
    Medical Science Educator, 2020, 30 : 243 - 252
  • [6] Integration of Basic and Clinical Sciences: Student Perceptions
    van der Hoeven, Dharini
    Zhu, Liang
    Busaidy, Kamal
    Quock, Ryan L.
    Holland, J. Nathaniel
    van der Hoeven, Ransome
    MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 2020, 30 (01) : 243 - 252
  • [7] Bridging the gap between basic and clinical sciences: A description of a radiological anatomy course
    Torres, Anna
    Staskiewicz, Grzegorz J.
    Lisiecka, Justyna
    Pietrzyk, Lukasz
    Czekajlo, Michael
    Arancibia, Carlos U.
    Maciejewski, Ryszard
    Torres, Kamil
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2016, 9 (03) : 295 - 303
  • [8] Examining the effect of self-explanation on cognitive integration of basic and clinical sciences in novices
    Lisk, Kristina
    Agur, Anne M. R.
    Woods, Nicole N.
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2017, 22 (05) : 1071 - 1083
  • [9] INTEGRATION OF BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY IN THE DENTAL CURRICULUM - A CLINICALLY ORIENTATED APPROACH TO TEACHING ORAL AND DENTAL ANATOMY
    GOTJAMANOS, T
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1990, 35 (03) : 290 - 293
  • [10] Incorporation and evaluation of serial concept maps for vertical integration and clinical reasoning in case-based learning tutorials: Perspectives of students beginning clinical medicine
    Penuela-Epalza, Martha
    De la Hoz, Karla
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2019, 41 (04) : 433 - 440