Clinical and radiographic changes at implants supporting single-unit crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with one cantilever extension. A retrospective study

被引:43
作者
Aglietta, Marco [1 ]
Siciliano, Vincenzo Iorio [2 ]
Blasi, Andrea [2 ]
Sculean, Anton [1 ]
Braegger, Urs [3 ]
Lang, Niklaus P. [4 ]
Salvi, Giovanni E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodontol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Periodontol, Naples, Italy
[3] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Div Fixed Prosthodont, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
bone level; bone loss; cantilever extension; dental implants; fixed dental prosthesis; overload; 10-YEAR PROSPECTIVE COHORT; LEAST; 5; YEARS; PARTIAL DENTURES; COMPLICATION RATES; CHRONIC PERIODONTITIS; OBSERVATION PERIOD; ORAL IMPLANTS; ITI-IMPLANTS; SURVIVAL; ADJACENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02391.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic changes at implants in posterior maxillary and mandibular areas supporting single-unit crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with one mesial or distal cantilever extension after an observation period of at least 3 years. Material and methods: Seventeen subjects with 19 implant-supported SCs and 21 subjects with 21 implant-supported FDPs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All FDPs were supported by two implants and had a span of 3-4 units. All reconstructions were incorporated in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The mesial and distal radiographic marginal bone loss from baseline (i.e. delivery of the reconstruction) to the follow-up examination was averaged and compared between SCs supporting one cantilever extension with that of implants supporting FDPs adjacent to or distant from the cantilever extension. Changes in mean pocket probing depth (PPD) were calculated and compared between the three groups. Results: The mean observation period was 78.2 +/- 34.5 months for SCs supported by one implant and 67.8 +/- 29.8 months for FDPs supported by two implants. No implant loss occurred, yielding a 100% survival rate. At baseline, the mean radiographic bone levels +/- SD were 2.6 +/- 0.3 mm for implants supporting SCs, 2.6 +/- 0.3 mm for implants of FDPs adjacent to the cantilever extension, and 2.4 +/- 0.5 mm for implants of FDPs distant from the cantilever extension. At follow-up, the corresponding mean bone levels +/- SD were 2.7 +/- 0.4, 2.7 +/- 0.5, and 2.8 +/- 0.5 mm, respectively. No statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed comparing the mean marginal bone loss between the three groups. Moreover, mean changes in PPD between baseline and follow-up were not statistically significantly different (P > 0.05) between the three groups. Conclusion: The presence of one mesial or distal cantilever extension in the posterior maxilla or mandible does not jeopardize the marginal bone levels of implants supporting SCs or short-span FDPs after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 555
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years [J].
Aglietta, Marco ;
Siciliano, Vincenzo Iorio ;
Zwahlen, Marcel ;
Braegger, Urs ;
Pjetursson, Biarni E. ;
Lang, Niklaus P. ;
Salvi, Giovanni E. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (05) :441-451
[2]   Complication and failure rates of fixed dental prostheses in patients treated for periodontal disease [J].
Braegger, Urs ;
Hirt-Steiner, Stefanie ;
Schnell, Natascha ;
Schmidlin, Kurt ;
Salvi, Giovanni E. ;
Pjetursson, Bjarni ;
Matuliene, Giedre ;
Zwahlen, Marcel ;
Lang, Niklaus P. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (01) :70-77
[3]   Technical and biological complications/failures with single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants:: a 10-year prospective cohort study [J].
Brägger, U ;
Karoussis, I ;
Persson, R ;
Pjetursson, B ;
Salvi, G ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (03) :326-334
[4]   Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants .1. 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants [J].
Buser, D ;
MericskeStern, R ;
Bernard, JP ;
Behneke, A ;
Behneke, N ;
Hirt, HP ;
Belser, UC ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (03) :161-172
[5]  
Esposito M, 2011, EUR J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V4, P21
[6]   Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla [J].
Gastaldo, JF ;
Cury, PR ;
Sendyk, WR .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 75 (09) :1242-1246
[7]   Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers [J].
Haelg, Gian Andrea ;
Schmid, Juerg ;
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (10) :983-990
[8]   The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI(R) implants on marginal soft and hard tissues [J].
Hammerle, CHF ;
Bragger, U ;
Burgin, W ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (02) :111-119
[9]   Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis:: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI® Dental Implant System [J].
Karoussis, IK ;
Salvi, GE ;
Heitz-Mayfield, LJA ;
Brägger, U ;
Hämmerle, CHF ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (03) :329-339
[10]  
Krennmair G, 2003, INT J PROSTHODONT, V16, P524