Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia

被引:49
|
作者
Gallemore, Caleb [1 ]
Di Gregorio, Monica [2 ,3 ]
Moeliono, Moira [3 ]
Brockhaus, Maria [3 ]
Prasti H, Rut Dini
机构
[1] NE Illinois Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
REDD; Indonesia; Forest; Multi-level governance; Network analysis; Transaction costs; SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS; CO-BENEFITS; DEFORESTATION; NETWORKS; REDD+; ORGANIZATIONS; COLLABORATION; INSTITUTIONS; COOPERATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.024
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Since 2005, there has been considerable international interest in Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD +), a program intended to finance protection of tropical forests through the sale of carbon offsets or from donor funding. Requiring the collaboration of local and international civil society stakeholders, firms, and donor and host governments, REDO + is inherently a multi-level governance project, but to date participation in REDD + and coordination across governmental levels have been weak. Combining literature on multi-level and polycentric governance of socioecological systems with transaction-cost economics, we argue that transaction costs structure cross-level information-sharing and collaboration relationships among organizations engaged in REDD+ policy development at the national and provincial levels in Indonesia. Using an exponential random graph modelling approach with data collected from interviews with over 80 organizations between 2010 and 2012, We find that powerful organizations tend to dominate cross-level connections, though this effect is somewhat mediated by organizational similarity, which reduces transaction costs. We suggest that explicit efforts to help local organizations overcome the transaction costs of building cross-level relationships will be a central component of building an effective and equitable multi-level governance system for REDD + in Indonesia. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 179
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] International embeddedness of European multi-level governance
    Knodt, M
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2004, 11 (04) : 701 - 719
  • [42] European Multi-Level Governance and the Path to Development
    Rotaru, Ciprian
    Curea, Stefania Cristina
    Troaca, Victor Adrian
    Gole, Iulian
    Georgescu, Raluca
    Dima, Cristina
    EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH VISION 2020, 2019, : 4561 - 4568
  • [43] Discursive barriers and cross-scale forest governance in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
    Gallemore, Caleb T.
    Prasti, Rut Dini H.
    Moeliono, Moira
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (02):
  • [44] Ocean Governance in the Coral Triangle: A Multi-Level Regulatory Governance Structure
    Heck, Sarah A.
    POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2022, 10 (03): : 70 - 79
  • [45] Politics of innovation in multi-level water governance systems
    Daniell, Katherine A.
    Coombes, Peter J.
    White, Ian
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 519 : 2415 - 2435
  • [46] Creative placemaking and the NEA: unpacking a multi-level governance
    Redaelli, Eleonora
    POLICY STUDIES, 2016, 37 (04) : 387 - 402
  • [47] Europeanization and new patterns of multi-level governance in Romania
    Dobre, Ana Maria
    SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN AND BLACK SEA STUDIES, 2010, 10 (01) : 59 - 70
  • [48] Locating Cities and Their Governments in Multi-Level Sustainability Governance
    Hickmann, Thomas
    POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2021, 9 (01): : 211 - 220
  • [49] MULTI-LEVEL REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNANCE: A EUROPEAN TYPOLOGY
    Cotella, Giancarlo
    Rivolin, Umberto Janin
    Pede, Elena
    Pioletti, Maurizio
    EUROPEAN SPATIAL RESEARCH AND POLICY, 2021, 28 (01) : 201 - 221
  • [50] Multi-level governance application to a shared river basin
    de Assis, Wanessa Dunga
    Rios Ribeiro, Marcia Maria
    da Silva, Simone Rosa
    RBRH-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE RECURSOS HIDRICOS, 2020, 25