The comparative effect of computer-aided instruction and traditional teaching on student's creativity in math classes

被引：9

作者：

Aqda, Mahnaz Fatemi ^{[1
]}

Hamidi, Farideh ^{[1
]}

Rahimi, Mehrak ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] ShahidRajaee Teacher Training Univ, Dept Educ, POB 167855-163, Tehran, Iran

[2] ShahidRajaee Teacher Training Univ, Dept Language, Tehran, Iran

来源：

WORLD CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (WCIT-2010) | 2011年 / 3卷

关键词：

Computer-aided instruction (CAI); Traditional teaching; Creativity; Mathematic classes; Junior Students;

D O I：

10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.045

中图分类号：

TP301 [理论、方法];

学科分类号：

081202 ;

摘要：

The current study aimed at comparing the effect of traditional teaching (lecturing) and computer-aided instruction (CAI) on students' creativity in math classes. A quasi-experimental design with control and experimental groups and pre- and post-test was utilized. Fifty seven students were selected according to simple random sampling from junior high schools in Tehran. Research instrument was the Persian version of Torrance Creativity Test (form B). A personal information questionnaire was also used to make a profile of participants' demographic. Results showed that CAI was significantly more effective on creativity, elaboration, and originality of students than traditional teaching of math. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the Guest Editor.

引用

页数：5

共 29 条

[1]

Adams K., 2006, The Sources of Innovation and Creativity, New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce

[2]

Aliasgari M., 2008, ED BUSINESS SOC CONT, P6

[3]

Ambil T.M, 1998, HARVARD BUSINESS SEP

[4]

Anderson T., 2006, E LEARNING THEORY PR

[5]

[Anonymous], 1981, Motivation and Personality

[6]

Chang Chun-yang, 2001, AARE C FREM AUSTR

[7]

Dodge B, 1991, JORNAL COLIFORNIA AS, V21, P5

[8]

Edmunds A.L, 1990, CANADIAN J SPECIAL E, V6, P61

[9]

Gogne R.M, 1977, CONDITION LEARNING

[10]

GUILFORD JP, 1987, FRONTIERS CREATIVITY

← 1 2 3 →