Believing, Bonding, Behaving, and Belonging: The Big Four Religious Dimensions and Cultural Variation

被引:249
作者
Saroglou, Vassilis [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Psychol, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
religious differences; religious universals; religious dimensions; cultural influences; spirituality; VALUE PRIORITIES; MENTAL-HEALTH; ORIENTATION; IDENTITY; BELIEFS; SPIRITUALITY; COMPASSION; ATTACHMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; GOD;
D O I
10.1177/0022022111412267
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
When approaching religion from a cross-cultural psychological perspective, one faces questions regarding the universals and the specifics of religions across cultural contexts. On the basis of previous theorization and research, the author proposes a model that posits four basic dimensions of religion and individual religiosity that are partially distinct although interconnected: believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging. These dimensions are presumably universally present across religions and cultural contexts and delimitate religion from other similar constructs. They reflect distinct psychological processes (cognitive, emotional, moral, and social), respective goals, conversion motives, types of self-transcendence, and mechanisms explaining the religion-health links. However, across cultural and religious groups, these dimensions may differ in content, salience, and ways in which they are interconnected or emphasized, leading to various forms of religiosity, including functional and dysfunctional ones. Within each dimension, there is additional universality (in structure) and cultural variability (in salience) regarding the way religious cognitions, emotions, morality, and identity are processed. This Big Four religious dimensions model may be a powerful tool for studying universals and cultural specifics of the psychological dimensions of religion.
引用
收藏
页码:1320 / 1340
页数:21
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [1] Aarnio K., 2007, J INDIVID DIFFER, V28, P1, DOI DOI 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.1
  • [2] PERSONAL RELIGIOUS ORIENTATION AND PREJUDICE
    ALLPORT, GW
    ROSS, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 5 (04) : 432 - &
  • [3] Altemeyer Bob., 2005, Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, P378
  • [4] Altemeyer R. A., 1996, AUTHORITARIAN SPECTE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1991, Human Universals
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1962, RELIGIOUS EDUC, DOI DOI 10.1080/003440862057S407
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1966, The Idea of the Holy : An Inquiry Into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2003, Archive for the Psychology of Religion, DOI DOI 10.1163/157361203X00057
  • [9] Assmann Jan., 2009, The Price of Monotheism
  • [10] Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion
    Atran, S
    Norenzayan, A
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2004, 27 (06) : 713 - +