Risk aversion, prudence and temperance: It is a matter of gap between moments

被引:6
作者
Colasante, Annarita [1 ]
Riccetti, Luca [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaume 1, Econ Dept, Ave Sos Baynat, Castellon De La Plana 12071, Spain
[2] Univ Macerata, Macerata, Italy
关键词
Behavioral finance; Experiment; Choice under uncertainty; Moments of return distribution; Utility function; HIGHER-ORDER; SKEWNESS PREFERENCE; EXPECTED UTILITY; SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY; PROSPECT-THEORY; ATTITUDES; CHOICE; DECISION; MODELS; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbef.2019.100262
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Higher order risk preferences are important determinants of choices under uncertainty. We build a questionnaire different from usually adopted ones: our questionnaire is simpler in order to reduce the number of random choices, and it includes questions with largely diversified stake sizes to observe different gaps between moments. Moreover, we collect results from a large and heterogeneous population to provide more general and unbiased results. Our results confirm the preference of the majority of the respondents for higher odd and lower even moments of the expected return distribution. However, we highlight three features: (i) the importance of the gap between the values of the corresponding moments of the two choices, (ii) the behavioral change in presence of a positive/zero/negative expected value, (iii) the huge heterogeneity in behaviors, also due to the complexity of the choice as an important driver of the propensity to switch from choosing on the basis of preferences to choosing randomly. We also find that age and geographical location are important determinants of risk propensity. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 79 条
[11]   NONLINEAR PREFERENCES AND 2-STAGE LOTTERIES - THEORIES AND EVIDENCE [J].
BERNASCONI, M .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1994, 104 (422) :54-70
[12]  
Bleichrodt H., 2018, WORKING PAPER
[13]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5
[14]   Mixed risk aversion [J].
Caballe, J ;
Pomansky, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1996, 71 (02) :485-513
[15]   Skewness Preference, Risk Taking and Expected Utility Maximisation [J].
Chiu, W. Henry .
GENEVA RISK AND INSURANCE REVIEW, 2010, 35 (02) :108-129
[16]   Even (Mixed) Risk Lovers are Prudent [J].
Crainich, David ;
Eeckhoudt, Louis ;
Trannoy, Alain .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (04) :1529-1535
[17]   Gender Differences in Preferences [J].
Croson, Rachel ;
Gneezy, Uri .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2009, 47 (02) :448-474
[18]  
De Bondt W., 2008, Journal of Applied Finance, V18, P7
[19]   ON THE ROBUSTNESS OF HIGHER ORDER RISK PREFERENCES [J].
Deck, Cary ;
Schlesinger, Harris .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND INSURANCE, 2018, 85 (02) :313-333
[20]   CONSISTENCY OF HIGHER ORDER RISK PREFERENCES [J].
Deck, Cary ;
Schlesinger, Harris .
ECONOMETRICA, 2014, 82 (05) :1913-1943