Risk aversion, prudence and temperance: It is a matter of gap between moments

被引:6
作者
Colasante, Annarita [1 ]
Riccetti, Luca [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaume 1, Econ Dept, Ave Sos Baynat, Castellon De La Plana 12071, Spain
[2] Univ Macerata, Macerata, Italy
关键词
Behavioral finance; Experiment; Choice under uncertainty; Moments of return distribution; Utility function; HIGHER-ORDER; SKEWNESS PREFERENCE; EXPECTED UTILITY; SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY; PROSPECT-THEORY; ATTITUDES; CHOICE; DECISION; MODELS; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbef.2019.100262
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Higher order risk preferences are important determinants of choices under uncertainty. We build a questionnaire different from usually adopted ones: our questionnaire is simpler in order to reduce the number of random choices, and it includes questions with largely diversified stake sizes to observe different gaps between moments. Moreover, we collect results from a large and heterogeneous population to provide more general and unbiased results. Our results confirm the preference of the majority of the respondents for higher odd and lower even moments of the expected return distribution. However, we highlight three features: (i) the importance of the gap between the values of the corresponding moments of the two choices, (ii) the behavioral change in presence of a positive/zero/negative expected value, (iii) the huge heterogeneity in behaviors, also due to the complexity of the choice as an important driver of the propensity to switch from choosing on the basis of preferences to choosing randomly. We also find that age and geographical location are important determinants of risk propensity. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 79 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], J EC BEHAV ORG
[3]  
[Anonymous], RUHR EC PAP
[4]  
[Anonymous], WORKING PAPER
[5]   RISK AND REQUIRED RETURN ON EQUITY [J].
ARDITTI, FD .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1967, 22 (01) :19-36
[6]   Skewness seeking: risk loving, optimism or overweighting of small probabilities? [J].
Astebro, Thomas ;
Mata, Jose ;
Santos-Pinto, Luis .
THEORY AND DECISION, 2015, 78 (02) :189-208
[7]  
Astebro Thomas., 2009, Preference for skew in lotteries: Evidence from the laboratory
[8]   Measuring higher order ambiguity preferences [J].
Baillon, Aurelien ;
Schlesinger, Harris ;
van de Kuilen, Gijs .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (02) :233-256
[9]   SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY OF COMPOUND EVENTS [J].
BARHILLEL, M .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1973, 9 (03) :396-406
[10]   Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study [J].
Barsky, RB ;
Juster, FT ;
Kimball, MS ;
Shapiro, MD .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) :537-579