A review of the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Aravalli Craton, northwestern India: Structural, metamorphic and geochronological perspectives from the basement complexes and supracrustal sequences

被引:13
作者
Ghosh, Suranjan [1 ]
D'Souza, Joseph [2 ]
Goud, B. Ravinder [3 ]
Prabhakar, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Earth Sci, Mumbai 400076, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol ISM, Dept Appl Geol, Dhanbad 826004, India
[3] Atom Minerals Directorate Explorat & Res, Hyderabad 500016, India
关键词
Aravalli Craton; Banded Gneissic Complex; Aravalli-Delhi Fold Belt; Precambrian crustal evolution; Northwestern India; DELHI FOLD BELT; ZIRCON U-PB; KHETRI COPPER BELT; GRANITE GNEISS COMPLEX; MALANI IGNEOUS SUITE; NEOPROTEROZOIC TECTONOTHERMAL EVOLUTION; PALEO-MESOPROTEROZOIC SUPERCONTINENT; SANDMATA GRANULITE COMPLEX; HIGH-PRESSURE METAMORPHISM; CONTINENTAL ARC MAGMATISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104098
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The Aravalli Craton, representing the Precambrian nucleus of northwestern India, consists of the Archean Banded Gneissic Complex (BGC; 3.3-2.5 Ga) overlain by Paleoproterozoic (-2.2-1.7 Ga) and Paleo-to Neoproterozoic (-1.7-0.7 Ga) metasedimentary sequences of the Aravalli and Delhi supergroups, respectively. The extensively reworked Late Paleoproterozoic terrane located between the Aravalli and Delhi supracrustal sequences is known as the Sandmata Complex. The BGC, Sandmata Complex and supracrustal sequences, collectively known as Aravalli Craton, were developed by multiple accretionary-collisional processes from-3.3 to 0.7 Ga and are regarded as classical terranes for understanding Precambrian crustal evolution. The previous multidisciplinary studies have invariably described the litho-tectonic relationships of the Aravalli Craton. Considering the volu-minous literature and arguable interpretations, we present a holistic review addressing the Mesoarchean to Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the basement and the polydeformed supracrustal sequences of Aravalli and Delhi supergroups. We suggest that the Aravalli Craton evolved by the accretionary-collisional interactions be-tween three major crustal domains, viz., the Mewar gneissic terrane and intrusive granitoids (-3.3-2.5 Ga), the Aravalli fold belt (-2.2-1.7 Ga) and the Delhi fold belt (-1.7-0.7 Ga). The Mewar gneissic terrane formed between 3.3 Ga and 2.7 Ga by partial melting of hydrated mafic crust, where the terrane evolved continuously and finally stabilized due to the collision between the Bundelkhand and Aravalli cratons, resulting in the emplacement of several granitoids between 2.6 and 2.4 Ga. The subsequent development of the Aravalli fold belt (-2.2-1.7 Ga) to the west of Mewar gneissic terrane was characterized by the-2.2-2.1 Ga mafic-ultramafic volcanism and-1.8-1.7 Ga felsic magmatism, marking the opening and closing of the Aravalli Basin, respec-tively. The final closure of this basin was contemporaneous with the exhumation of the Sandmata granulite terrane along the western margin of Aravalli fold belt. Although the Sandmata Complex was previously inter-preted as a reworked equivalent of the basement gneisses, based on contrasting lithology, deformation styles and metamorphic grade, we infer that the Sandmata Complex possibly represents an independent terrane with a distinct tectonothermal history. The tectonic evolution of the Delhi Basin most likely took place in two stages from-1.7 to 0.7 Ga. The initial stage (-1.7-1.4 Ga) led to the development of the north Delhi fold belt and emplacement of A-type granitoids (-1.5-1.4 Ga), whereas the high-grade metamorphism and I-and S-type granite magmatism in the southern part characterize the later stage (-1.3-0.7 Ga) of the Delhi Basin. Following the Delhi Basin closure, the areas to the west of the Aravalli Craton witnessed the emplacement of the Malani Igneous Suite and the development of the Sirohi and Marwar basins. Altogether, the available key information on structural patterns, magmatic-metamorphic histories and geochronology allows more detailed correlations with possible contiguous orogens of the Great Indian Proterozoic Fold Belt. Our synthesis and tectonic interpretations help us discuss and provide alternate explanations for some of the controversial issues from existing tectonic models. Further, we summarize important unresolved issues, which require special attention to improve our knowledge of the Archean to Proterozoic crustal evolution in northwestern India.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 322 条
  • [1] Acharyya SK, 2000, J GEOL SOC INDIA, V55, P239
  • [2] Geochemical evolution of the Mangalwar Complex, Aravalli Craton, NW India: Insights from elemental and Nd-isotope geochemistry of the basement gneisses
    Ahmad, Iftikhar
    Mondal, M. E. A.
    Bhutani, Rajneesh
    Satyanarayanan, M.
    [J]. GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2018, 9 (03) : 931 - 942
  • [3] Geochemistry of Archean metasedimentary rocks of the Aravalli craton, NW India: Implications for provenance, paleoweathering and supercontinent reconstruction
    Ahmad, Iftikhar
    Mondal, M. E. A.
    Satyanarayanan, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 126 : 58 - 73
  • [4] Provenance of Proterozoic Basal Aravalli mafic volcanic rocks from Rajasthan, Northwestern India: Nd isotopes evidence for enriched mantle reservoirs
    Ahmad, T.
    Dragusanu, C.
    Tanaka, T.
    [J]. PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2008, 162 (1-2) : 150 - 159
  • [5] Fluid inclusion, geochemical, Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd isotope studies on tungsten mineralized Degana and Balda granites of the Aravalli craton, NW India
    Anand, Sundarrajan Vijay
    Pandian, M. S.
    Balakrishnan, S.
    Sivasubramaniam, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2018, 127 (04)
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1999, PROC SEM GEOLOGY RAJ
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1982, PROC S PRECAMBRIAN M
  • [8] Geochronology and geochemistry of Neoproterozoic Mt. Abu granitoids, NW India: Regional correlation and implications for Rodinia paleogeography
    Ashwal, L. D.
    Solanki, A. M.
    Pandit, M. K.
    Corfu, F.
    Hendriks, B. W. H.
    Burke, K.
    Torsvik, T. H.
    [J]. PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2013, 236 : 265 - 281
  • [9] Bakliwal PC, 1987, REC GEOL SURV INDIA, V113, P54
  • [10] Banerjee A., 2022, LITHOS, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.LITHOS.2022.106740