Acceptability of Self-Management Group Education to Reduce Fear of Hypoglycemia as a Barrier to Physical Activity in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Mixed Methods Approach

被引:12
作者
Brennan, Marian C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brown, Janie A. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Leslie, Gavin D. [1 ]
Ntoumanis, Nikos [3 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Curtin Sch Nursing, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[2] Diabet WA, Hlth Serv, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Phys Act & Well Being Res Grp, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] St John God Midland Publ & Private Hosp, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Western Australian Grp Evidence Informed Healthca, Perth, WA, Australia
[6] Curtin Univ, Curtin Sch Populat Hlth, Perth, WA, Australia
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Sports Sci & Clin Biomech, Odense, Denmark
[8] Halmstad Univ, Sch Hlth & Welf, Halmstad, Sweden
关键词
adults; diabetes mellitus type 1; exercise; fear of hypoglycemia; health education; self-management; EXERCISE; CONSENSUS; EFFICACY; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.04.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Mixed methods were used to evaluate a group self-management education intervention to address type 1 diabetes (T1D)-specific barriers to physical activity (PA). We evaluated the acceptability of study resources and procedures. Methods: Consenting participants from a quantitative evaluation (n=70) were invited to participate in 1 of 5 focus groups. Interviews explored the acceptability of procedures across the randomized controlled trial schedule, acceptability of the intervention/control workshops and resources and the perceived effectiveness of the intervention/control on participant outcomes. The use and helpfulness of intervention take-home resources, Facebook data and fidelity coding were also examined to inform other aspects of intervention acceptability. Results: Twenty-one focus group participants from control or intervention arms participated in 1 of the 5 focus groups. Participants were 46 +/- 10 years of age; about half were female and had been living with T1D for 23 +/- 16 years. Study procedures were widely accepted; however, randomization and some aspects of the questionnaire were of concern to a small number of participants. Group education was acceptable and preferred, but participants expressed ambivalence toward the private Facebook group. Control participants indicated that basic information on PA guidelines and hypoglycemia risk are not currently being provided in standard care. Fidelity assessment confirmed the intervention was delivered consistently and was facilitated using behaviours and communication skills based on social cognitive theory. Conclusions: Future definitive evaluation of this promising intervention should utilize a blinded randomized controlled trial study design. Alterations to the control workshop are required to better reflect standard care in Australia. Our qualitative findings suggest that group education can be an acceptable and preferred method of education in T1D management for PA. (c) 2021 Canadian Diabetes Association.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods
    Althubaiti, Alaa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2016, 9 : 211 - 217
  • [2] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2018, PHYS ACT LIF STAG
  • [3] SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) : 191 - 215
  • [4] Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO, DOI DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
  • [5] Bengtsson M., 2016, Nursing Plus Open, V2, P8, DOI [10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001, DOI 10.1016/J.NPLS.2016.01.001]
  • [6] Impact of Physical Activity on Glycemic Control and Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-sectional Multicenter Study of 18,028 Patients
    Bohn, Barbara
    Herbst, Antje
    Pfeifer, Martin
    Krakow, Dietmar
    Zimny, Stefan
    Kopp, Florian
    Melmer, Andreas
    Steinacker, Juergen M.
    Holl, Reinhard W.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2015, 38 (08) : 1536 - 1543
  • [7] A pilot program for physical exercise promotion in adults with type 1 diabetes: the PEP-1 program
    Brazeau, Anne-Sophie
    Gingras, Veronique
    Leroux, Catherine
    Suppere, Corinne
    Mircescu, Hortensia
    Desjardins, Katherine
    Briand, Philippe
    Ekoe, Jean-Marie
    Rabasa-Lhoret, Remi
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2014, 39 (04) : 465 - 471
  • [8] Barriers and facilitators of physical activity participation in adults living with type 1 diabetes: a systematic scoping review
    Brennan, Marian C.
    Brown, Janie A.
    Ntoumanis, Nikos
    Leslie, Gavin D.
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2021, 46 (02) : 95 - 107
  • [9] Brennan MC, CAN J DIABETES, V2021
  • [10] Chatterjee S., 2018, PRACT DIABETES, V35, P19