Distribution of economically important viral diseases in cattle

被引:0
|
作者
Salomskas, Algirdas [1 ,2 ]
Jacevicius, Eugenijus [1 ]
Kestaitiene, Kristina [1 ]
Petkevicius, Saulius [1 ]
Lukauskas, Kazimieras [1 ]
Liutkeviciene, Vida [1 ]
Milius, Jonas [4 ]
Venskutonis, Donatas [3 ]
Mockeliunas, Raimundas [1 ]
Jokimas, Juozas [5 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Vet Acad, Dept Infect Dis, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Lithuanian Vet Acad, Vet Inst, Dept Virol, LT-56115 Kaisiadorys, Lithuania
[3] Kaunas Univ Med, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
[4] Lithuanian Vet Acad, Dept Food Safety & Anim Hyg, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania
[5] Lithuanian Vet Acad, Dept Non Infect Dis, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania
来源
VETERINARIJA IR ZOOTECHNIKA | 2008年 / 41卷 / 63期
关键词
parainfluenza; 3; respiratory sincytial virus; infectious bovine rhinotracheitis; bovine viral diarrhea virus; seroprevalence; cattle;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Extending previous studies the current situation of livestock infectious diseases e.g. parainfluenza 3 virus (PI-3), respiratory sincytial virus (RSV), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) and bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) were serologically monitored in 19 randomly selected pedegree cattle farms in Lithuania. From 2006 to 2007 PI-3 and BVBV (n=558), RV and IBR (n=538) using antibody ELISA were tested. In the majority of serologically investigated farms antibodies for mixed infections of PI-3, BVDV, RV and IBR were detected, and only in five farms antibodies for mixed infections of two or three monitored diseases were diagnosed. PI-3 and RSV were most frequently detected in investidated farms (95%). The mean serological prevalence of IBR and BVDV in investigated farms was 84,2% and 85%. However, among individual animals in tested farms 72,2%, 54,5%, 43,4% and 3 0,5% were seropositive to PI-3, RSV, BVDV and IBR, respectively. This antibody ELISA test implies that mixed PI-3, BVDV, RSV and IBR livestock virus infectious diseases are frequent in pedegree cattle farms in Lithuania. Moreover, these findings suggest that mean of individual animals in investigated farms are variable, but may be a potential reservuar for virus transmission.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 100
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PREVENTIVE MEDICINE FOR SOME ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT BOVINE VIRAL DISEASES
    HEUSCHELE, WP
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-LARGE ANIMAL PRACTICE, 1981, 3 (02): : 403 - 415
  • [2] ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT DISEASES OF LETTUCE
    PATTERSON, CL
    GROGAN, RG
    CAMPBELL, RN
    PLANT DISEASE, 1986, 70 (10) : 982 - 987
  • [3] ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT DISEASES OF SPINACH
    CORRELL, JC
    MORELOCK, TE
    BLACK, MC
    KOIKE, ST
    BRANDENBERGER, LP
    DAINELLO, FJ
    PLANT DISEASE, 1994, 78 (07) : 653 - 660
  • [4] Economically important non-oncogenic immunosuppressive viral diseases of chicken - Current status
    Balamurugan, V.
    Kataria, J. M.
    VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2006, 30 (05) : 541 - 566
  • [5] Follow Up of Maternally Derived Antibodies Titer against Economically Important Viral Diseases of Chicken
    Ali, M. Z.
    Hasan, B.
    POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2018, 6 (02) : 149 - 154
  • [6] DISTRIBUTION AND UTILIZATION OF ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PALMS
    VONMAYDE.HJ
    ERICHSEN, H
    MITTEILUNGEN DER BUNDESFORSCHUNGSANSTALT FUR FORST-UND HOLZWIRTSCHAFT, 1968, (69): : 4 - &
  • [7] Economically Important Animal and Zoonotic Diseases in Bangladesh
    Baqi, M. A.
    ECOHEALTH, 2011, 7 : S107 - S107
  • [8] Special Issue: Advances in Vaccine Research against Economically Important Viral Diseases of Food Animals Preface
    Lee, Chang-Won
    Osorio, Fernando A.
    Woolums, Amelia R.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 206 : 1 - 2
  • [9] Phytopathological assessment of reaction of genotypes from variety group burley tobacco to economically important viral diseases
    Yonchev, Yonko
    Dyulgerski, Yovko
    BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2021, 27 (04): : 688 - 692
  • [10] Diagnosis and immunoprophylaxis of economically important poultry diseases: A review
    Kataria, JM
    Mohan, CM
    Dey, S
    Dash, BB
    Dhama, K
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2005, 75 (05): : 555 - 567