New forms of "governance", social participation and conflict. Some reflections on the processes of re-urbanization of villas in the City of Buenos Aires (Argentina)

被引:0
作者
Florencia Rodriguez, Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Arqueros Mejica, Maria Soledad [2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
Carla Rodriguez, Maria [2 ,3 ,7 ,8 ]
Cecilia Zapata, Maria [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Sociol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Buenos Aires, Inst Invest Gino Germani, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Pte Uriburu 950,6 Piso Taller 16, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[5] Univ Nacl Avellaneda, Dock Sud, Argentina
[6] UBA, FADU, Pte Uriburu 950,6 Piso Taller 16, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[7] UBA, Carrera Sociol, Teoria Urbana, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[8] Pte Uriburu 950,6 Piso Oficina 16, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[9] Univ Buenos Aires UBA, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
来源
REVISTA DE DIREITO DA CIDADE-CITY LAW | 2020年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
governance; social participation; conflict; urban redevelopment; Buenos Aires;
D O I
10.12957/rdc.2020.39669
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
The objective of the article is to analyze the processes of social participation and conflict generated within the framework of the Re-urbanization Program of Villa 31 and 31 bis promoted by the Government of the City of Buenos Aires (GCBA) (Argentina) since 2016 until today. Through a qualitative methodology of construction of primary data coming from in-depth interviews (to inhabitants of the town, members of social organizations, officials and state workers) and participant observation in dialogues with technical actors driven by the executing agency of the political, it was evident that there is great discontent of the inhabitants around the instances of social participation wielded by the program, with high levels of territorial conflict. This implies that the permanent mechanisms of participation in the execution of policy are not guarantee per I know that all the actors have the same weight in the decision making. Rather, the different techniques deployed by the new governance refer to practices of legitimation of a housing policy that implicitly seeks the valorization of the neoliberal city, far from building instances of consensus and real participation that result in the reduction of socio-urban inequality.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 447
页数:28
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ANDREANUCCI Luciano, 2000, ELEMENTOS ANALISIS P
[2]   Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe, 1960-2000 [J].
Brenner, N .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2004, 11 (03) :447-488
[3]  
Brenner N., 2002, ESPACIOS NEOLIBERALI
[4]  
CARDENALLI Graciela, 2002, GESTION ASOCIADA UTO
[5]  
Catenazzi A., 2009, GESTION POLITICA SOC, P201
[6]  
COHEN Jean L., 2000, Sociedad Civil y Teoria Politica
[7]  
Coraggio J.L., 2003, II Semanario Nacional Fortaleciendo la Relacion Estado-Sociedad Civil Para el Desarrollo Local
[8]  
Cuenya B., 2011, Revista Digital del Programa Gestion de la Ciudad
[9]  
CUNILL GRAU Nuria, 1995, REV CLAD REFORMA DEM
[10]  
D?az Orueta F., 2013, METAMORFOSIS URBANAS, P81