Can exposure limitations for well-known contact allergens be simplified? An analysis of dose-response patch test data

被引:29
作者
Fischer, Louise Arup [1 ]
Menne, Torkil [1 ]
Voelund, Aage
Johansen, Jeanne Duus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte Hosp, Natl Allergy Res Ctr, Dept Dermatoallergol, DK-2820 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
allergy prevention; dose-response; elicitation; exposure limitation; patch test; LYMPH-NODE ASSAY; APPLICATION TEST THRESHOLDS; SKIN SENSITIZATION; RISK-ASSESSMENT; NICKEL ALLERGY; EXPERIMENTAL ELICITATION; DERMATITIS; INDIVIDUALS; POTENCY; METHYLDIBROMOGLUTARONITRILE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01876.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Allergic contact dermatitis is triggered by chemicals in the environment. Primary prevention is aimed at minimizing the risk of induction, whereas secondary and tertiary prevention are aimed at reducing elicitation. Objectives. To identify the elicitation doses that will elicit an allergic reaction in 10% of allergic individuals under patch test conditions (ED(10) patch test) for different allergens, and to compare the results with those for different allergens and with animal data indicating sensitizing potency from the literature. Materials and methods. The literature was searched for patch test elicitation studies that fulfilled six selected criteria. The elicitation doses were calculated, and fitted dose-response curves were drawn. Results. Sixteen studies with eight different allergens-methylchloroisothiazolinone/ methylisothiazolinone, formaldehyde, nickel, cobalt, chromium, isoeugenol, hydroxyiso hexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde, and methyldibromo glutaronitrile-were selected. The median ED(10) value was 0.835 mu g/cm2. The ED(10) patch test values were all within a factor of 7 from the lowest to the highest value, leaving out three outliers. No obvious patterns between the sensitization and elicitation doses for the allergens were found. Conclusions. We found a rather small variation in the ED(10) patch test between the allergens, and no clear relationship between induction potency and elicitation threshold of a range of allergens. This knowledge may stimulate thoughts on introducing a generic approach for limitations in exposure to well-known allergens.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 342
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   DOSE-RESPONSE TESTING WITH NICKEL SULFATE USING THE TRUE TEST(R) IN NICKEL-SENSITIVE INDIVIDUALS - MULTIPLE NICKEL SULFATE PATCH-TEST REACTIONS DO NOT CAUSE AN ANGRY BACK [J].
ANDERSEN, KE ;
LIDEN, C ;
HANSEN, J ;
VOLUND, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1993, 129 (01) :50-56
[2]   The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals [J].
Andersen, KE ;
Johansen, JD ;
Bruze, M ;
Frosch, PJ ;
Goossens, A ;
Lepoittevin, JP ;
Rastogi, S ;
White, I ;
Menné, T .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 170 (03) :166-171
[3]  
Api A.M., 2006, DERMAL SENSITIZATION
[4]   Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients [J].
Api, Anne Marie ;
Basketter, David A. ;
Cadby, Peter A. ;
Cano, Marie-France ;
Ellis, Graham ;
Gerberick, G. Frank ;
Griem, Peter ;
McNamee, Pauline M. ;
Ryan, Cindy A. ;
Safford, Robert .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 52 (01) :3-23
[5]   Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium [J].
Basketter, D ;
Horev, L ;
Slodovnik, D ;
Merimes, S ;
Trattner, A ;
Ingber, A .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 44 (02) :70-74
[6]   Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Andersen, KE ;
Liden, C ;
van Loveren, H ;
Boman, A ;
Kimber, I ;
Alanko, K ;
Berggren, E .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 52 (01) :39-43
[7]   The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation [J].
Basketter, David A. ;
Gerberick, Frank ;
Kimber, Ian .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2007, 57 (02) :70-75
[8]   The impact of exposure variables on the induction of skin sensitization [J].
Basketter, David A. ;
Jefferies, Donna ;
Safford, Bob J. ;
Gilmour, Nicola J. ;
Jowsey, Ian R. ;
McFadden, John ;
Chansinghakul, Wannisa ;
Duangdeeden, Imelda ;
Kullavanijaya, Preya .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2006, 55 (03) :178-185
[9]   Deodorants:: an experimental provocation study with isoeugenol [J].
Bruze, M ;
Johansen, JD ;
Andersen, KE ;
Frosch, P ;
Goossens, A ;
Lepoittevin, JP ;
Rastogi, SC ;
White, I ;
Menné, T .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 52 (05) :260-267
[10]   Methyldibromoglutaronitrile allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds [J].
Fischer, L. A. ;
Johansen, J. D. ;
Menne, T. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2008, 159 (05) :1138-1143