Performance of [68Ga] Ga-PSMA 11 PET for detecting prostate cancer in the lymph nodes before salvage lymph node dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:35
作者
Kimura, Shoji [1 ,2 ]
Abufaraj, Mohammad [1 ,3 ]
Janisch, Florian [1 ,4 ]
Iwata, Takehiro [1 ,5 ]
Parizi, Mehdi Kardoust [1 ,6 ]
Foerster, Beat [1 ,7 ]
Fossati, Nicola [8 ,9 ]
Briganti, Alberto [8 ,9 ]
Egawa, Shin [2 ]
Hartenbach, Markus [10 ]
Shariat, Shahrokh F. [1 ,11 ,12 ,13 ,14 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[2] Jikei Univ Sch Med, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Jordan Univ Hosp, Univ Jordan, Dept Special Surg, Amman, Jordan
[4] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Okayama Univ Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Okayama, Japan
[6] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Shariati Hosp, Dept Urol, Tehran, Iran
[7] Kantonsspital Winterthur, Dept Urol, Winterthur, Switzerland
[8] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Div Oncol, Unit Urol, URI, Milan, Italy
[9] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[10] Med Univ Vienna, Div Nucl Med, Dept Biomed Imaging & Image Guided Therapy, Vienna, Austria
[11] Sechenov Univ, Inst Urol & Reprod Hlth, Moscow, Russia
[12] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[13] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Dallas, TX USA
[14] Karl Landsteiner Inst Urol & Androl, Vienna, Austria
关键词
ESTRO-SIOG GUIDELINES; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; HBED-CC; LYMPHADENECTOMY; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1038/s41391-019-0156-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) for nodal recurrence in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) is still not recommended in current guidelines, because of the diagnostic inaccuracy of current conventional imaging. To assess the performance of [Ga-68] Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen conjugate 11 positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) in detecting PCa lymph node metastasis using pathologic confirmation through sLND. Methods Literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on November 11th, 2018 to identify the eligible studies. Studies were eligible if they investigated the diagnostic performance of PSMA-PET before sLND in PCa patients with BCR and reported the number of true positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative on a lesion-based and/or field-based analyses to compare with histopathologic findings in sLND specimens. Results Fourteen studies published between 2015 and 2018 comprising 462 patients were selected in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The positive predictive value of PSMA-PET before sLND on a patient-based analysis ranged between 0.70 and 0.93. The pooled sensitivity using lesion-based and field-based analyses were 0.84 (95%CI: 0.61-0.95) and 0.82 (95%CI: 0.72-0.89), respectively. The pooled specificity using lesion-based and field-based analyses were 0.97 (95%CI: 0.95-0.99) and 0.95 (95%CI: 0.70-0.99), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio using lesion-based and field-based analyses were 189 (95%CI: 39-920) and 82 (95%CI: 8-832), respectively. Conclusions PSMA-PET before sLND provided highly accurate performance with clinically relevant high positive and negative predictive values for detecting lymph node disease in patients with BCR after local treatment with curative intent for PCa. PSMA-PET can identify the patients who are likely to benefit from sLND and possibly direct to lesion or region-based dissection.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer
    Afshar-Oromieh, Ali
    Avtzi, Eleni
    Giesel, Frederik L.
    Holland-Letz, Tim
    Linhart, Heinz G.
    Eder, Matthias
    Eisenhut, Michael
    Boxler, Silvan
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Kratochwil, Clemens
    Weichert, Wilko
    Kopka, Klaus
    Debus, Juergen
    Haberkorn, Uwe
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 (02) : 197 - 209
  • [2] Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves
    Arends, L. R.
    Hamza, T. H.
    van Houwelingen, J. C.
    Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H.
    Hunink, M. G. M.
    Stijnen, T.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 28 (05) : 621 - 638
  • [3] Cancer Control and Functional Outcomes of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Radiation-recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Chade, Daher C.
    Eastham, James
    Graefen, Markus
    Hu, Jim C.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Klotz, Laurence
    Montorsi, Francesco
    van Poppel, Hendrik
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (05) : 961 - 971
  • [4] EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Cornford, Philip
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    Bolla, Michel
    Briers, Erik
    De Santis, Maria
    Gross, Tobias
    Henry, Ann M.
    Joniau, Steven
    Lam, Thomas B.
    Mason, Malcolm D.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Mottet, Nicolas
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (04) : 630 - 642
  • [5] Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand-positron-emission Tomography: Still Just the Tip of the Iceberg
    Dundee, Philip
    Gross, Tobias
    Moran, Diarmaid
    Ryan, Andrew
    Ballok, Zita
    Peters, Justin
    Costello, Anthony J.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2018, 120 : 187 - 191
  • [6] Predicting 15-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Han, Misop
    Partin, Alan W.
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Wood, David P.
    Eastham, James A.
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Rabah, Danny M.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Yu, Changhong
    Klein, Eric A.
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (03) : 869 - 875
  • [7] Radiolabeled choline PET/CT before salvage lymphadenectomy dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Evangelista, Laura
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Karnes, Robert J.
    Novara, Giacomo
    Lowe, Val
    [J]. NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 37 (12) : 1223 - 1231
  • [8] 11C-CHOLINE VERSUS 68GA-PSMA PET/CT SCAN FOR THE DETECTION OF NODAL RECURRENCE FROM PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS FROM A LARGE, MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL SALVAGE LYMPH NODE DISSECTION SERIES
    Fossati, Nicola
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Stabile, Armando
    Colicchia, Michele
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Haidl, Friederike
    Pfister, David
    Porres, Daniel
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Gratzke, Christian
    Herlemann, Annika
    Stief, Christian
    Battaglia, Antonino
    Everaerts, Wouter
    Joniau, Steven
    Van Poppel, Hein
    Aksenov, Alexey V.
    Osmonov, Daniar K.
    Juenemann, Klaus-Peter
    Abreu, A. D. L.
    Almeida, Fabio
    Fay, C.
    Gill, Inderbir
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04) : E1021 - E1021
  • [9] Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Freedland, SJ
    Humphreys, EB
    Mangold, LA
    Eisenberger, M
    Dorey, FJ
    Walsh, PC
    Partin, AW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (04): : 433 - 439
  • [10] Role of salvage lymph node dissection in prostate cancer
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Moul, Judd W.
    Shariat, Shahrokh
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2016, 26 (06) : 581 - 589