Fuel quality changes during seasonal storage of compacted logging residues and young trees

被引:119
作者
Pettersson, M. [1 ]
Nordfjell, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Resource Management & Geomat, Sect Forest Technol, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
关键词
windrow; drying; moisture content; ash content; calorific value; compaction; clear felling; CRL; power-line corridor; dry matter losses;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.009
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Forest fuel procurement creates logistical problems, as large stocks are accumulated along the supply chain. The purpose of this study was to examine fuel quality (moisture content, ash content and calorific value) of compacted young trees (mainly downy birch) and both uncompacted and compacted logging residues (LR) (mainly Norway spruce). The materials were examined before and after storage, with and without cover, and effects of handling were considered. Dry matter losses from compacted LR during storage and handling were determined. Fuel quality and mass were determined before and after storage and handling. The moisture content of LR dropped to 28.6% when stored in small piles after fuel adapted logging at the clear felling site for 3 weeks in May. Drying continued after compaction into cylindrical bales (length 3.4 m, diameter 0.7 m) and during storage in windrows (9 and 12 months), the moisture content falling to 18.2-20.7% for the covered and 18.8-24.9% for the uncovered material. The windrow of loose LR remoistened to 40.8% (by snow contamination) resulted in a 6% lower net calorific value as received, compared to cylindrical bales. Ash contents were in the range 1.6-2.2% for LR and 1.0-1.2% for young trees. Dry matter losses ranged from 8.4% to 18.1 % on compacted LR. Remoistening during the winter is higher for loose than for compacted LR. Early summer in northern Sweden provides favourable conditions for drying forest fuels. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 792
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Andersson G., 2002, BIOENERGY SUSTAINABL
[2]  
BJORKLUND L, 1984, 143 SVERG LANTBR I V
[3]  
BOHMLARSSON M, 2004, FRAKTIONSFORDELNING, P16
[4]  
EGNELL, 1998, MILJOKONSEKVENSBESKR
[5]  
ERIKSSON B, 1986, 46 SMHI RMK
[6]  
FLINKMAN M, 1986, 180 SV LANTHBR I VIR
[7]  
FLINKMAN M, 1986, 174 SVER LANGBR I VI
[8]  
HAKKILA P, 2003, 52003 VTT
[9]  
Hakkila P., 2002, Bioenergy from Sustainable Forestry, Guiding Principles and Practice
[10]  
Hakkila P., 1989, Utilization of Residual Forest Biomass