Financial Crisis, "New" Industrial Policy, and the Bite of Multilateral Trade Rules

被引:18
作者
Aggarwal, Vinod K. [1 ]
Evenett, Simon J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley APEC Study Ctr BASC, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
financial crisis; industrial policy; protectionism; trade rules; World Trade Organization; F02; F13; F51; F53; F59;
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-3131.2010.01166.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The recent Great Recession has triggered substantial government intervention - not all of it macroeconomic. This article presents evidence that the sectoral incidence and forms of government intervention appear to have changed from pre-crisis regularities. Once the commercial significance of a sector is taken into account, pre-crisis measures of trade policy intervention poorly predict the crisis-era sectoral incidence of discriminatory state measures imposed by Asian governments. Qualitative evidence focusing on three key countries in Asia - China, Japan, and South Korea - is also marshaled to sustain the contention that Asian governments have used the recent economic crisis to reinvigorate industrial policies, targeting apparent growth poles and apparently environmentally friendly technologies and sectors. Implications for the expansion of World Trade Organization rules and their effectiveness are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 244
页数:24
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Aggarwal Vinod K., 2007, APEC TRADE AGENDA PO, P37
[2]  
AGGARWAL VK, 2009, BROKEN PROMISES G20, P125
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Business Monitor International
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, REUTERS 0119
[5]  
Balfour F, 2009, BLOOMBERG BUSIN 1102
[6]   Politics of Trade in the USA and in the Obama Administration: Implications for Asian Regionalism [J].
Barfield, Claude .
ASIAN ECONOMIC POLICY REVIEW, 2009, 4 (02) :227-243
[7]  
BINGO M, 2009, JAPAN BUSINESS 0916
[8]  
BRADSHER K, 2009, NY TIMES 0713
[9]  
Bradsher Keith, 2010, NY TIMES 0130
[10]  
CARTY S, 2010, US TODAY 0120