Identifying ambulatory cancer patients at risk of impaired capacity to consent to research

被引:39
作者
Casarett, DJ
Karlawish, JHT
Hirschman, KB
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Bioeth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Div Geriatr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Alzheimers Dis Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Sch Social Work, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
competence; decision-making capacity; ethics; research ethics; informed consent; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PALLIATIVE CARE RESEARCH; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INFORMED CONSENT; TREATMENT DECISIONS; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; METASTATIC CANCER; ONCOLOGY PATIENTS; PAIN MANAGEMENT; COMPETENCE;
D O I
10.1016/S0885-3924(03)00221-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Ethicists and others have expressed concerns that some patients with cancer might lack adequate decision-making capacity to give consent,for research. Although this concern is plausible, it is not known what patient characteristics might be used to identify those Patients who are at risk and who therefore should undergo a formal assessment of decision-making capacity. Forty-five patients with cancer were Presented with a description of a randomized controlled trial, accompanied by an Institutional Review Board-approved consent form. Two raters who were blind to all patient characteristics assessed decision-making capacity using the MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool for Clinical Research. These scores were summarized in overall capacity judgments using criteria established by a panel of experts. Subjects also completed a symptom rating scale and a battery of neuropsychiatric tests. No relationship was observed between symptom severity and any domain of decision-making capacity (understanding, appreciation, reasoning, ability to express a choice) or summary judgments. However, several other patient characteristics, including age, education, and selected neuropsychiatric test results, were found to be strongly associated with capacity scores. These data suggest that several patient characteristics, such as age, education, and tests of cognitive functions, may help investigators to identify patients with impaired capacity to give consent for research. (C) 2003 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 624
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL USING VIDEOTAPE TO PRESENT CONSENT INFORMATION FOR COLONOSCOPY [J].
AGRE, P ;
KURTZ, RC ;
KRAUSS, BJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (03) :271-276
[2]  
[Anonymous], J GERONTOLOGY
[3]  
Appelbaum PS, 1999, AM J PSYCHIAT, V156, P1380
[4]   Multicentre randomised controlled trial of nursing intervention for breathlessness in patients with lung cancer [J].
Bredin, M ;
Corner, J ;
Krishnasamy, M ;
Plant, H ;
Bailey, C ;
A'Hern, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7188) :901-904
[5]   Fatigue in ambulatory AIDS patients [J].
Breitbart, W ;
McDonald, MV ;
Rosenfeld, B ;
Monkman, ND ;
Passik, S .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1998, 15 (03) :159-167
[6]   COGNITIVE FAILURE IN CANCER-PATIENTS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BRUERA, E ;
SPACHYNSKI, K ;
MACEACHERN, T ;
HANSON, J .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8839) :247-248
[7]   Decisional capacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research [J].
Carpenter, WT ;
Gold, JM ;
Lahti, AC ;
Queern, CA ;
Conley, RR ;
Bartko, JJ ;
Kovnick, J ;
Appelbaum, PS .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 57 (06) :533-538
[8]   Environmental cues affecting development [J].
Casal, JJ .
CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2002, 5 (01) :37-42
[9]  
Casarett D, 2001, J Palliat Med, V4, P441, DOI 10.1089/109662101753381566
[10]   Are special ethical guidelines needed for palliative care research? [J].
Casarett, DJ ;
Karlawish, JHT .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (02) :130-139