Safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundVarious modalities of vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), based on different platforms and immunization procedures, have been successively approved for marketing worldwide. A comprehensive review for clinical trials assessing the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is urgently needed to make an accurate judgment for mass vaccination.Main textA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the safety of COVID-19 vaccine candidates in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Scopus, Web of Science, and MedRxiv. Included articles were limited to RCTs on COVID-19 vaccines. A total of 73,633 subjects from 14 articles were included to compare the risks of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) after vaccinating different COVID-19 vaccines. Pooled risk ratios (RR) of total AEFI for inactivated vaccine, viral-vectored vaccine, and mRNA vaccine were 1.34 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.61, P<0.001], 1.65 (95% CI 1.31-2.07, P<0.001), and 2.01 (95% CI 1.78-2.26, P<0.001), respectively. No significant differences on local and systemic AEFI were found between the first dose and second dose. In addition, people aged <less than or equal to>55 years were at significantly higher risk of AEFI than people aged >= 56 years, with a pooled RR of 1.25 (95% CI 1.15-1.35, P<0.001).ConclusionsThe safety and tolerance of current COVID-19 vaccine candidates are acceptable for mass vaccination, with inactivated COVID-19 vaccines candidates having the lowest reported AEFI. Long-term surveillance of vaccine safety is required, especially among elderly people with underlying medical conditions.