Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test

被引:6893
作者
Greenwald, AG [1 ]
McGhee, DE [1 ]
Schwartz, JLK [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Psychol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
An implicit association test (IAT) measures differential association of 2 target concepts with an attribute. The 2 concepts appear in a 2-choice task (e.g., flower vs, insect names), and the attribute in a 2nd task (e.g., pleasant vs. unpleasant words for an evaluation attribute). When instructions oblige highly associated categories (e.g., flower + pleasant) to share a response key, performance is faster than when less associated categories (e.g., insect + pleasant) share a key. This performance difference implicitly measures differential association of the 2 concepts with the attribute. In 3 experiments, the TAT was sensitive to (a) near-universal evaluative differences (e.g., flower vs. insect), (b) expected individual differences in evaluative associations (Japanese + pleasant vs. Korean + pleasant for Japanese vs. Korean subjects), and (c) consciously disavowed evaluative differences (Black + pleasant vs. White + pleasant for self-described unprejudiced White subjects).
引用
收藏
页码:1464 / 1480
页数:17
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   THE GENERALITY OF THE AUTOMATIC ATTITUDE ACTIVATION EFFECT [J].
BARGH, JA ;
CHAIKEN, S ;
GOVENDER, R ;
PRATTO, F .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (06) :893-912
[2]   CATEGORY NORMS FOR VERBAL ITEMS IN 56 CATEGORIES - A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION OF CONNECTICUT CATEGORY NORMS [J].
BATTIG, WF ;
MONTAGUE, WE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 80 (3P2) :1-&
[3]   WORDS HIGH AND LOW IN PLEASANTNESS AS RATED BY MALE AND FEMALE COLLEGE-STUDENTS [J].
BELLEZZA, FS ;
GREENWALD, AG ;
BANAJI, MR .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1986, 18 (03) :299-303
[4]  
Breckler S.G., 1986, HDB MOTIVATION COGNI, P145
[5]   OCCURRENCE VERSUS MODERATION OF THE AUTOMATIC ATTITUDE ACTIVATION EFFECT - REPLY [J].
CHAIKEN, S ;
BARGH, JA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 64 (05) :759-765
[6]   RECENT UNOBTRUSIVE STUDIES OF BLACK AND WHITE DISCRIMINATION AND PREJUDICE - A LITERATURE-REVIEW [J].
CROSBY, F ;
BROMLEY, S ;
SAXE, L .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1980, 87 (03) :546-563
[7]  
DASGUPTA N, 1998, UNPUB MEASURING IMPL
[9]  
Dovidio J.F., 1995, M SOC EXP SOC PSYCH
[10]  
FARNHAM SD, 1998, M MIDW PSYCH ASS CHI