Modulating the Activity of the DLPFC and OFC Has Distinct Effects on Risk and Ambiguity Decision-Making: A tDCS Study

被引:31
作者
Yang, Xiaolan [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Mei [3 ]
Shi, Jinchuan [2 ]
Ye, Hang [4 ,5 ]
Chen, Shu [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Int Studies Univ, Sch Business & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Acad Financial Res, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Econ, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Neuro & Behav EconLab, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Interdisciplinary Ctr Social Sci, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
risk decision-making; ambiguity decision-making; dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; orbital frontal cortex; transcranial direct current stimulation; DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN BRAIN; EMOTION REGULATION; TAKING BEHAVIOR; WORKING-MEMORY; NEURAL SYSTEMS; UNCERTAINTY; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01417
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Human beings are constantly exposed to two types of uncertainty situations, risk and ambiguity. Neuroscientific studies suggest that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the orbital frontal cortex (OFC) play significant roles in human decision making under uncertainty. We applied the transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) device to modulate the activity of participants' DLPFC and OFC separately, comparing the causal relationships between people's behaviors and the activity of the corresponding brain cortex when confronted with situations of risk and ambiguity. Our experiment employed a pre-post design and a risk/ambiguity decision-making task, from which we could calculate the preferences via an estimation model. We found evidences that modulating the activity of the DLPFC using right anodal/left cathodal tDCS significantly enhanced the participants' preferences for risk, whereas modulating the activity of the OFC with right anodal/left cathodal tDCS significantly decreased the participants' preferences for ambiguity. The reverse effects were also observed in the reversed tDCS treatments on the two areas. Our results suggest that decision-making processes under risk and ambiguity are complicated and may be encoded in two distinct circuits in our brains as the DLPFC primarily impacts decisions under risk whereas the OFC affects ambiguity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Visual evoked potentials modulation during direct current cortical polarization [J].
Accornero, Neri ;
Voti, Pietro Li ;
La Riccia, Maurizio ;
Gregori, Bruno .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 178 (02) :261-266
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, J. Behav. Decis. Mak., DOI [DOI 10.1002/BDM.3960010303, 10.1002/bdm.3960010303]
[3]   The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision [J].
Bechara, A ;
Damasio, AR .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2005, 52 (02) :336-372
[4]   Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex [J].
Bechara, A ;
Tranel, D ;
Damasio, H ;
Damasio, AR .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 1996, 6 (02) :215-225
[5]   Dealing With Uncertainty: Testing Risk-and Ambiguity-Attitude Across Adolescence [J].
Blankenstein, Neeltje E. ;
Crone, Eveline A. ;
van den Bos, Wouter ;
van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C. K. .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 41 (1-2) :77-92
[6]   Modulation of emotions associated with images of human pain using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) [J].
Boggio, Paulo S. ;
Zaghi, Soroush ;
Fregni, Felipe .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 47 (01) :212-217
[7]   Subjective expected utility without preferences [J].
Bouyssou, Denis ;
Marchant, Thierry .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 55 (06) :457-468
[8]   Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules [J].
Brand, Matthias ;
Recknor, Emily C. ;
Grabenhorst, Fabian ;
Bechara, Antoine .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 29 (01) :86-99
[9]   The role of intuition and reasoning in driving aversion to risk and ambiguity [J].
Butler, Jeffrey V. ;
Guiso, Luigi ;
Jappelli, Tullio .
THEORY AND DECISION, 2014, 77 (04) :455-484
[10]   RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING PREFERENCES - UNCERTAINTY AND AMBIGUITY [J].
CAMERER, C ;
WEBER, M .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1992, 5 (04) :325-370