Variability of manual segmentation of the prostate in axial T2-weighted MRI: A multi-reader study

被引:45
作者
Becker, Anton S. [1 ,2 ]
Chaitanya, Krishna [3 ]
Schawkat, Khoschy [1 ,4 ]
Muehlematter, Urs J. [1 ]
Hoetker, Andreas M. [1 ]
Konukoglu, Ender [3 ]
Donati, Olivio F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Comp Vis Lab, Dept Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Segmentation; Prostate; Zonal anatomy; Interreader agreement; Variability; VALIDATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108716
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the interreader variability in prostate and seminal vesicle (SV) segmentation on T2w MRI. Methods: Six readers segmented the peripheral zone (PZ), transitional zone (TZ) and SV slice-wise on axial T2w prostate MRI examinations of n = 80 patients. Twenty different similarity scores, including dice score (DS), Hausdorff distance (HD) and volumetric similarity coefficient (VS), were computed with the VISCERAL EvaluateSegmentation software for all structures combined and separately for the whole gland (WG = PZ + TZ), TZ and SV. Differences between base, midgland and apex were evaluated with DS slice-wise. Descriptive statistics for similarity scores were computed. Wilcoxon testing to evaluate differences of DS, HD and VS was performed. Results: Overall segmentation variability was good with a mean DS of 0.859 (+/- SD = 0.0542), HD of 36.6 (+/- 34.9 voxels) and VS of 0.926 (+/- 0.065). The WG showed a DS, HD and VS of 0.738 (+/- 0.144), 36.2 (+/- 35.6 vx) and 0.853 (+/- 0.143), respectively. The TZ showed generally lower variability with a DS of 0.738 (+/- 0.144), HD of 24.8 (+/- 16 vx) and VS of 0.908 (+/- 0.126). The lowest variability was found for the SV with DS of 0.884 (+/- 0.0407), HD of 17 (+/- 10.9 vx) and VS of 0.936 (+/- 0.0509). We found a markedly lower DS of the segmentations in the apex (0.85 +/- 0.12) compared to the base (0.87 +/- 0.10, p < 0.01) and the midgland (0.89 +/- 0.10, p < 0.001). Conclusions: We report baseline values for interreader variability of prostate and SV segmentation on T2w MRI. Variability was highest in the apex, lower in the base, and lowest in the midgland.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RADIOLOGY
[2]  
[Anonymous], RADIOLOGY
[3]   Machine learning classifiers can predict Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer with greater accuracy than experienced radiologists [J].
Antonelli, Michela ;
Johnston, Edward W. ;
Dikaios, Nikolaos ;
Cheung, King K. ;
Sidhu, Harbir S. ;
Appayya, Mrishta B. ;
Giganti, Francesco ;
Simmons, Lucy A. M. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Allen, Clare ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Atkinson, David ;
Ourselin, Sebastien ;
Punwani, Shonit .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (09) :4754-4764
[4]   Direct comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and version 1 regarding interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer [J].
Becker, Anton S. ;
Cornelius, Alexander ;
Reiner, Cacilia S. ;
Stocker, Daniel ;
Ulbrich, Erika J. ;
Barth, Borna K. ;
Mortezavi, Ashkan ;
Eberli, Daniel ;
Donati, Olivio F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 94 :58-63
[5]   Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods [J].
Bezinque, Adam ;
Moriarity, Andrew ;
Farrell, Crystal ;
Peabody, Henry ;
Noyes, Sabrina L. ;
Lane, Brian R. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (12) :1582-1587
[6]   Semi-supervised and Task-Driven Data Augmentation [J].
Chaitanya, Krishna ;
Karani, Neerav ;
Baumgartner, Christian F. ;
Becker, Anton ;
Donati, Olivio ;
Konukoglu, Ender .
INFORMATION PROCESSING IN MEDICAL IMAGING, IPMI 2019, 2019, 11492 :29-41
[7]   Prostate Segmentation in HIFU Therapy [J].
Garnier, Carole ;
Bellanger, Jean-Jacques ;
Wu, Ke ;
Shu, Huazhong ;
Costet, Nathalie ;
Mathieu, Romain ;
de Crevoisier, Renaud ;
Coatrieux, Jean-Louis .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2011, 30 (03) :792-803
[8]   Distinct effects of rectum delineation methods in 3D-confromal vs. IMRT treatment planning of prostate cancer [J].
Guckenberger, Matthias ;
Meyer, Juergen ;
Baier, Kurt ;
Vordermark, Dirk ;
Flentje, Michael .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2006, 1 (1)
[9]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Prostate Biopsy in Men With Repeat Negative Biopsies and Increased Prostate Specific Antigen [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Hoeks, Caroline ;
Bouwense, Stefan A. W. ;
Huisman, Henkjan ;
Yakar, Derya ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02) :520-527
[10]   Hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer [J].
Hegemann, Nina-Sophie ;
Guckenberger, Matthias ;
Belka, Claus ;
Ganswindt, Ute ;
Manapov, Farkhad ;
Li, Minglun .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9