Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations

被引:47
作者
Cohen, L. B. [1 ]
Sanyal, S. M. [1 ]
von Althann, C. [1 ]
Bodian, C. [2 ]
Whitson, M. [1 ]
Bamji, N. [1 ]
Miller, K. M. [1 ]
Mavronicolas, W. [1 ]
Burd, S. [1 ]
Freedman, J. [1 ]
Aisenberg, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Med Gastroenterol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
BOWEL PREPARATION; SODIUM-PHOSPHATE; QUALITY; VOLUME; BISACODYL; IMPACT; MULTICENTER; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04390.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The 2-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) lavage solutions provide efficacy similar to that of standard 4-L PEG formulations in spite of the reduced volume. The comparative efficacy and tolerability of two formulations of 2-L PEG solution remain unknown. Aims To assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of PEG + Bis compared with PEG + Asc, and to study the effect of bowel cleansing quality on adenoma detection rates. Methods Patients were randomized to receive either 2-L PEG with ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc) or 2-L PEG plus bisacodyl 10 mg (PEG + Bis). The primary endpoint was overall colon cleansing score, assessed by blinded investigators using a validated four-point scale. Secondary endpoints included adenoma detection rate, patient tolerability and compliance and adverse events. Results Fifty-two patients received PEG + Asc and 55 patients received PEG + Bis. Overall colon cleansing scores (+/- s.d.) were 1.40 +/- 0.69 and 1.75 +/- 0.70 (P < 0.003) in the PEG + Asc and PEG + Bis groups, respectively. Excellent and good ratings were recorded in 69% and 23% receiving PEG + Asc compared to 38% and 51% (P = 0.01) of patients receiving PEG + Bis. More adenomas were detected in colonoscopies performed with PEG + Asc (39%) than in those performed with PEG + Bis (20%) (P = 0.04). Patient tolerability and safety were similar with both preparations. Conclusion The use of PEG + Asc resulted in better colon cleansing and higher adenoma detection rates compared with PEG + Bis.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 644
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] ADAMS WJ, 1994, DIS COLON RECTUM, V37, P229, DOI 10.1007/BF02048160
  • [2] A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation
    Aoun, E
    Abdul-Baki, H
    Azar, C
    Mourad, F
    Barada, K
    Berro, Z
    Tarchichi, M
    Sharara, AI
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (02) : 213 - 218
  • [3] Aronchick C., 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P2667
  • [4] The impact of colon preparation timing on colonoscopic detection of colorectal neoplasms - A prospective endoscopist-blinded randomized trial
    Chiu, Han-Mo
    Lin, Jaw-Town
    Wang, Hsiu-Po
    Lee, Yi-Chia
    Wu, Ming-Shiang
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (12) : 2719 - 2725
  • [5] DAVIS GR, 1980, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V78, P991
  • [6] A Randomized Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a New, Reduced-Volume, Oral Sulfate Colon-Cleansing Preparation for Colonoscopy
    Di Palma, Jack A.
    Rodriguez, Reynaldo
    McGowan, John
    Cleveland, Mark vB.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (09) : 2275 - 2284
  • [7] DIPALMA JA, 1989, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V84, P1008
  • [8] Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG plus electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy
    Ell, Christian
    Fischbach, Wolfgang
    Bronisch, Hans-Joachim
    Dertinger, Stefan
    Layer, Peter
    Ruenzi, Michael
    Schneider, Thomas
    Kachel, Guenther
    Grueger, Joerg
    Koellinger, Michael
    Nagell, Waltraud
    Goerg, Karl-Josel
    Wanitschke, Roland
    Gruss, Hans-Juergen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (04) : 883 - 893
  • [9] Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study
    Froehlich, F
    Wietlisbach, V
    Gonvers, JJ
    Burnand, B
    Vader, JP
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) : 378 - 384
  • [10] Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia
    Harewood, GC
    Sharma, VK
    de Garmo, P
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (01) : 76 - 79