Evaluation of two DNA/RNA co-extraction methods for body fluid identification in forensics

Body fluid identification has become a field of interest in forensic casework as it can add value to particular investigative scenarios. Identifying the source of the biological material is not always an upfront task using conventional methods; therefore, profiling of specific mRNA markers can provide the answer. The implementation of RNA based analyses in forensic casework must focus on the quality and sensitivity of methods, starting with nucleic acid extraction, and without loss of DNA for STR profiling. In this work, two methods for DNA and RNA co-extraction were tested and compared: a commercial kit that uses a spin, mini column methodology, and a quick, simple nucleic acid isopropanol precipitation based protocol. Both methods simultaneously extract DNA and RNA, crucial for forensic casework and were tested in semen samples. Nucleic acid quantifications as well as purity assessment ratios (OD260/OD230 and OD260/OD280) were obtained by both methods to infer on the use of extracts in downstream applications such as PCR. The performance of the two tested protocols was further evaluated by analyzing two semen mRNA specific markers, PRM1 and SEMG1. When compared to the commercially developed kit, results suggest that the literature adapted protocol allowed more carryover of contaminants absorbing at 230 nm and 280 nm as the purity ratios were below the accepted standard ranges. Negative results for mRNA profiling supported the QC results obtained by spectrophotometry. On the hand, PRM1 and SEGM1 were positive in RNA samples extracted with the commercial kit.