Responsiveness of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale in Patients With Shoulder Pain and the Effect of Surgical Status

被引:170
作者
Michener, Lori A. [1 ]
Snyder, Alison R. [2 ]
Leggin, Brian G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[2] AT Still Univ, Athlet Training Program, Mesa, AZ USA
[3] Penn Presbyterian Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
surgery; minimal clinically important difference; rehabilitation; outcomes; HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES; LOW-BACK-PAIN; GENERAL-PRACTICE; PROGNOSTIC INDICATORS; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; PRIMARY-CARE; DISORDERS; INTENSITY; COHORT; GENERALIZABILITY;
D O I
10.1123/jsr.20.1.115
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Context: The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is commonly used to assess pain. Change in the NPRS across time can be interpreted with responsiveness indices. Objective: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the NPRS. Design: Single-group repeated measures. Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation clinics. Patients: Patients with shoulder pain (N = 136). Main Outcome Measures: At the initial evaluation patients completed the Penn Shoulder Score (PSS), which includes pain, satisfaction, and function sections. Pain was measured using an 11-point NPRS for 3 conditions of pain: at rest, with normal daily activities, and with strenuous activities. The NPRS average was calculated by averaging the NPRS scores for 3 conditions of pain. The final PSS was completed after 3-4 wk of rehabilitation. To determine the MCID for the NPRS average, the minimal detectible change of 8.6 points for the PSS function scale (0-60 points) was used as an external criterion anchor to classify patients as meaningfully improved (>= 8.6 point change) or not improved (<8.6-point change). The MCID for the NPRS average was also determined for subgroups of surgical and nonsurgical patients. Cohen's effect sizes were calculated as a measure of group responsiveness for the NPRS average. Results: Using a receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, the MCID for the average NPRS for all patients was 2.17, and it was 2.17 for both the surgical and nonsurgical subgroup: area-under-the-curve range .74-.76 (95%CI:.55-.95). The effect size for all patients was 1.84, and it was 1.51 and 1.94 for the surgical and nonsurgical groups, respectively. Conclusions: The NPRS average of 3 pain questions demonstrated responsiveness with an MCID of 2.17 in patients with shoulder pain receiving rehabilitation for 3-4 wk. The effect sizes indicated a large effect. However, responsiveness values are not static. Further research is indicated to assess responsiveness of the NPRS average in different types of patients with shoulder pain.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 128
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Angst F, 2002, J RHEUMATOL, V29, P131
  • [2] Beaton DE, 2001, ARTHRIT RHEUM-ARTHR, V45, P270, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200106)45:3<270::AID-ART260>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-T
  • [4] A taxonomy for responsiveness
    Beaton, DE
    Bombardier, C
    Katz, JN
    Wright, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (12) : 1204 - 1217
  • [5] Predictors of outcome in neck and shoulder symptoms - A cohort study in general practice
    Bot, SDM
    van der Waal, JM
    Terwee, CB
    van der Windt, DAWM
    Scholten, RJPM
    Bouter, LM
    Dekker, J
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (16) : E459 - E470
  • [6] Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain
    Childs, JD
    Piva, SR
    Fritz, JM
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) : 1331 - 1334
  • [7] Psychometric properties of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain
    Cleland, Joshua A.
    Childs, John A.
    Whitman, Julie M.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (01): : 69 - 74
  • [8] Reliability by surgical status of self-reported outcomes in patients who have shoulder pathologies
    Cook, KF
    Roddey, TS
    Olson, SL
    Gartsman, GM
    Valenzuela, FFT
    Hanten, WP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2002, 32 (07) : 336 - 346
  • [9] Croft P, 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P601
  • [10] Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale
    Farrar, JT
    Young, JP
    LaMoreaux, L
    Werth, JL
    Poole, RM
    [J]. PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) : 149 - 158