Improving the quality and safety of care on the medical ward: A review and synthesis of the evidence base

被引:24
作者
Pannick, Samuel [1 ]
Beveridge, Iain [2 ]
Wachter, Robert M. [3 ]
Sevdalis, Nick [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, NIHR Patient Safety Translat Res Ctr, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] West Middlesex Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Isleworth, Middx, England
[3] Univ CA, Div Hosp Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, NIHR Patient Safety Translat Res Ctr, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
Quality of health care; Patient safety; General wards; Delivery of health care; Inpatients; LENGTH-OF-STAY; STRUCTURED INTERDISCIPLINARY ROUNDS; EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAMS; NURSE-STAFFING LEVELS; PATIENT SAFETY; SIGN-OUT; HOSPITALIST HANDOFFS; WRONG CONCLUSIONS; ADMISSION UNIT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejim.2014.10.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Despite its place at the heart of inpatient medicine, the evidence base underpinning the effective delivery of medical ward care is highly fragmented. Clinicians familiar with the selection of evidence-supported treatments for specific diseases may be less aware of the evolving literature surrounding the organisation of care on the medical ward. This review is the first synthesis of that disparate literature. An iterative search identified relevant publications, using terms pertaining to medical ward environments, and objective and subjective patient outcomes. Articles (including reviews) were selected on the basis of their focus on medical wards, and their relevance to the quality and safety of ward-based care. Responses to medical ward failings are grouped into five common themes: staffing levels and team composition; interdisciplinary communication and collaboration; standardisation of care; early recognition and treatment of the deteriorating patient; and local safety climate. Interventions in these categories are likely to improve the quality and safety of care in medical wards, although the evidence supporting them is constrained by methodological limitations and inadequate investment in multicentre trials. Nonetheless, with infrequent opportunities to redefine their services, institutions are increasingly adopting multifaceted strategies that encompass groups of these themes. As the literature on the quality of inpatient care moves beyond its initial focus on the intensive care unit and operating theatre, physicians should be mindful of opportunities to incorporate evidence-based practice at a ward level. (C) 2014 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 887
页数:14
相关论文
共 123 条
[121]   Track and trigger in an emergency department: an observational evaluation study [J].
Wilson, Sarah J. ;
Wong, David ;
Clifton, David ;
Fleming, Susannah ;
Way, Rob ;
Pullinger, Richard ;
Tarassenko, Lionel .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (03) :186-191
[122]   Rapid-Response Systems as a Patient Safety Strategy A Systematic Review [J].
Winters, Bradford D. ;
Weaver, Sallie J. ;
Pfoh, Elizabeth R. ;
Yang, Ting ;
Pham, Julius Cuong ;
Dy, Sydney M. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (05) :417-+
[123]   Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes [J].
Zwarentein, M. ;
Goldman, J. ;
Reeves, S. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (03)