Drug-, dose- and sex-dependent effects of chronic fluoxetine, reboxetine and venlafaxine on open-field behavior and spatial memory in rats

被引:29
作者
Gray, Vanessa C. [1 ]
Hughes, Robert N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Psychol, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
关键词
Fluoxetine; Reboxetine; Venlafaxine; Rats; Anxiety; Spatial memory; REUPTAKE INHIBITOR REBOXETINE; ANXIETY-RELATED BEHAVIOR; FORCED SWIMMING TEST; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANTIDEPRESSANT DRUGS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; PHARMACOLOGICAL-TREATMENT; COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS; DEPRESSED-PATIENTS; MAJOR DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.023
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In an effort to address the need to include both sexes in studies of effects of the SSRI fluoxetine, the NRI reboxetine and the SNRI venlafaxine on anxiety-related behavior and memory along with the use of chronic drug administration, male and female PVG/c rats were fed diets containing two doses of each drug for 21 days. The rats' anxiety level was then assessed in an open field. Short-term spatial memory for a brightness change in a Y maze was also measured. While there was little evidence of anxiolytic effects of any of the drugs, both fluoxetine and, to a lesser extent, venlafaxine appeared to be mainly anxiogenic in their action depending on both dose and sex. Reboxetine was relatively ineffective in this respect. Ability to locate the Y-maze arm that had changed (from white to black) seemed to be impaired for male (but not female) rats by both fluoxetine and venlafaxine and, to a much lesser extent, by reboxetine. Given the relative ineffectiveness of reboxetine in either test, it is possible that the effects of the other two drugs on both anxiety and memory were mainly due to their serotonin reuptake inhibiting properties. The differences that occurred between males and females in responsiveness to all three drugs supported the long-held view that both sexes should be investigated in studies of this sort, especially in view of reports of sex differences in effects of clinically prescribed antidepressants. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 54
页数:12
相关论文
共 110 条
[81]   TAKING A CLOSER LOOK - TIME SAMPLING AND MEASUREMENT ERROR [J].
POWELL, J ;
MARTINDALE, B ;
KULP, S ;
MARTINDALE, A ;
BAUMAN, R .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1977, 10 (02) :325-332
[82]  
Poyurovsky M, 2009, ISR J PSYCHIATR REL, V46, P213
[83]   Female mice liberated for inclusion in neuroscience and biomedical research [J].
Prendergast, Brian J. ;
Onishi, Kenneth G. ;
Zucker, Irving .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2014, 40 :1-5
[84]   The Pharmacologic Treatment of Anxiety Disorders: A Review of Progress [J].
Ravindran, Lakshmi N. ;
Stein, Murray B. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 71 (07) :839-854
[85]   CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY OF OPEN-FIELD MEASURES [J].
ROYCE, JR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1977, 84 (06) :1098-1106
[86]   Pharmacological validation of a chronic social stress model of depression in rats:: effects of reboxetine, haloperidol and diazepam [J].
Rygula, Rafal ;
Abumaria, Nashat ;
Havemann-Reinecke, Ursula ;
Ruether, Eckart ;
Hiemke, Christoph ;
Zernig, Gerald ;
Fuchs, Eberhard ;
Fluegge, Gabriele .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 19 (03) :183-196
[87]   Effects of venlafaxine on ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats [J].
Saglam, E ;
Uzbay, IT ;
Kayir, H ;
Çelik, T ;
Beyazyürek, M .
FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 18 (06) :693-698
[88]   Evaluation of the effect of chronic antidepressant treatment on neurokinin-1 receptor expression in the rat brain [J].
Sartori, SB ;
Burnet, PWJ ;
Sharp, T ;
Singewald, N .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 46 (08) :1177-1183
[89]   The effect of subchronic fluoxetine treatment on learning and memory in adolescent rats [J].
Sass, Amdi ;
Wortwein, Gitta .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2012, 228 (01) :169-175
[90]   Up-regulation of tryptophan hydroxylase-2 mRNA in the rat brain by chronic fluoxetine treatment correlates with its antidepressant effect [J].
Shishkina, G. T. ;
Kalinina, T. S. ;
Dygalo, N. N. .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 150 (02) :404-412