Prototyping for public health in a local context: a streamlined evaluation of a community-based weight management programme (Momenta), Northumberland, UK

被引:4
作者
Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nevens, Lisa [4 ]
Oliver, Emily J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Finch, Tracy [5 ]
Lake, Amelia A. [6 ,7 ]
Hanson, Coral L. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Dept Sport & Exercise Sci, Durham, England
[2] Univ Durham, Wolfson Res Inst Hlth, Durham, England
[3] Univ Durham, Wolfson Res Inst Hlth, Wellbeing Phys Act Special Interest Grp, Durham, England
[4] Northumbria Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[5] Northumbria Univ, Dept Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[6] Teesside Univ, Dept Sci, Sch Sci Engn & Design, Middlesbrough, England
[7] Fuse UKCRC Ctr Translat Res Publ Hlth, London, England
[8] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 10期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
OBESITY; RISK; POPULATION; TRIAL; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029718
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Stakeholder co-production in design of public health programmes may reduce the 'implementation gap' but can be time-consuming and costly. Prototyping, iterative refining relevant to delivery context, offers a potential solution. This evaluation explored implementation and lessons learnt for a 12-week referral-based weight-management programme, 'Momenta', along with feasibility of an iterative prototyping evaluation framework. Design Mixed methods evaluation: Qualitative implementation exploration with referrers and service users; preliminary analysis of anonymised quantitative service data (12 and 52 weeks). Setting Two leisure centres in Northumberland, North East England. Participants Individual interviews with referring professionals (n=5) and focus groups with service users (n=13). Individuals (n=182) referred by healthcare professionals (quantitative data). Interventions Three 12-week programme iterations: Momenta (n=59), Momenta-Fitness membership (n=58) and Fitness membership only (n=65). Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome: Qualitative themes developed through stakeholder-engagement. Secondary outcomes included preliminary exploration of recruitment, uptake, retention, and changes in weight, body mass index, waist circumference and psychological well-being. Results Service users reported positive experiences of Momenta. Implementation gaps were revealed around the referral process and practitioner knowledge. Prototyping enabled iterative refinements such as broadening inclusion criteria. Uptake and 12-week retention were higher for Momenta (84.7%, 45.8%) and Momenta-Fitness (93.1%, 60.3%) versus Fitness only (75.4%, 24.6%). Exploration of other preliminary outcomes (completers only) suggested potential for within-group weight loss and increased psychological well-being for Momenta and Momenta-Fitness at 12 weeks. 52 week follow-up data were limited (32%, 33% and 6% retention for those who started Momenta, Momenta-Fitness and Fitness, respectively) but suggested potential weight loss maintenance for Momenta-Fitness. Conclusions Identification of issues within the referral process enabled real-time iterative refinement, while lessons learnt may be of value for local implementation of 'off-the-shelf' weight management packages more generally. Our preliminary data for completers suggest Momenta may have potential for weight loss, particularly when offered with a fitness membership.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Adams J, 2016, PLOS MED, V13, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1001990, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002045]
[2]   Inequalities in the uptake of weight management interventions in a pragmatic trial: an observational study in primary care [J].
Ahern, Amy L. ;
Aveyard, Paul ;
Boyland, Emma J. ;
Halford, Jason C. G. ;
Jebb, Susan A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 66 (645) :E258-E263
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PUBLIC HLTH RES, DOI DOI 10.3310/PHR03010
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Health matters: obesity and the food environment - GOV
[5]   Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5.24 million UK adults [J].
Bhaskaran, Krishnan ;
Douglas, Ian ;
Forbes, Harriet ;
dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel ;
Leon, David A. ;
Smeeth, Liam .
LANCET, 2014, 384 (9945) :755-765
[6]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, 10.1191/147 88088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/14788088706QP063OA]
[7]   Are interventions for low-income groups effective in changing healthy eating, physical activity and smoking behaviours? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bull, Eleanor R. ;
Dombrowski, Stephan U. ;
McCleary, Nicola ;
Johnston, Marie .
BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (11)
[8]   Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Validated for teenage school students in England and Scotland. A mixed methods assessment [J].
Clarke, Aileen ;
Friede, Tim ;
Putz, Rebecca ;
Ashdown, Jacquie ;
Martin, Steven ;
Blake, Amy ;
Adi, Yaser ;
Parkinson, Jane ;
Flynn, Pamela ;
Platt, Stephen ;
Stewart-Brown, Sarah .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
[9]   Effectiveness-implementation Hybrid Designs Combining Elements of Clinical Effectiveness and Implementation Research to Enhance Public Health Impact [J].
Curran, Geoffrey M. ;
Bauer, Mark ;
Mittman, Brian ;
Pyne, Jeffrey M. ;
Stetler, Cheryl .
MEDICAL CARE, 2012, 50 (03) :217-226
[10]   Adaptation to extreme weather events in complex health and social care systems: The example of older people's services in England [J].
Curtis, Sarah ;
Oven, Katie ;
Wistow, Jonathan ;
Dunn, Christine ;
Dominelli, Lena .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2018, 36 (01) :67-91