Family firms as agents of sustainable development: A normative perspective

被引:31
作者
Ernst, Robin-Alexander [1 ]
Gerken, Maike [1 ]
Hack, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Huelsbeck, Marcel [1 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Witten Inst Family Business, Alfred Herrhausen Str 50, D-58448 Witten, Germany
[2] Univ Bern, Inst Org & Human Resource Management IOP, Engehaldenstr 4, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Family firms; Corporate sustainability; Normative motivation; Socioemotional wealth; Family influence in management; Structural equation modelling; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; EMPIRICAL-TEST; FIT INDEXES; OWNERSHIP; MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS; MODEL; PRIVATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121135
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The reasons as to why family firms engage in corporate sustainability (CS) are poorly understood. In particular, those conditions that lead to a normative CS motivation, in which firms are driven by a sense of ethical responsibility, remain a theoretical black box. By integrating different theoretical explanations from research into family firms, CS and corporate governance, this study opens the black box and explains the interplay between family and firm antecedents, and how this affects normative CS motivation and hence CS performance. We empirically tested our hypotheses using survey-based data from a sample of 356 private family firms operating in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Results of the structural equation model show that counteracting effects exist within a family firm, which influence CS motivation, thus providing a nuanced answer to the inconsistent findings of previous research, regarding the direction and magnitude of family influence on CS performance. Our findings help clarify that, as owners, family members are likely to adopt a normative CS motivation driven by socioemotional considerations. However, as managers responsible for the firm's economic success, family members become risk-averse to the introduction of CS initiatives for normative reasons, because they bear the residual risk of management decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 151 条
[1]  
Abdullah S N., 2011, Corporate Ownership Control, V8, P417, DOI DOI 10.22495/COCV8I2C4P5
[2]   Corporate social responsibility versus corporate shareholder responsibility: A family firm perspective [J].
Abeysekera, Amal P. ;
Fernando, Chitru S. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 61
[3]   Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Rupp, Deborah E. ;
Williams, Cynthia A. ;
Ganapathi, Jyoti .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :836-863
[4]  
Aguinis H., 2011, Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well
[5]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[6]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[7]   Founding-family ownership, corporate diversification, and firm leverage [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (02) :653-684
[8]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[9]   Families as active monitors of firm performance [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Huelsbeck, Marcel ;
Lehmann, Erik E. .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS STRATEGY, 2013, 4 (02) :118-130
[10]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1988, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V16, P74, DOI [10.1007/BF02723327, DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1177/009207038801600107]