Comparative advantage, product quality, and the competitiveness of firms

被引:6
作者
Whang, Unjung [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Int Trade Policy, Sejong Si, South Korea
关键词
Comparative advantage; Firm heterogeneity; Firms' competitiveness; Quality differences; WAGE INEQUALITY; SKILLED-LABOR; TRADE; GOODS;
D O I
10.1108/JKT-06-2017-0061
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to emphasize the importance of product quality in differentiated-products markets in determining the structure of competition among firms. Design/methodology/approach - First, two distinct models of firm heterogeneity are considered as two possible structures for firms' competition: "price competition" and "quality competition." Then, the author exploits the bilateral trade data of the world's 83 largest countries in order to examine a link between the empirical findings and the theoretical models. Findings - The empirical findings support a model of "quality competition" rather than "price competition," in which firms in a country with a comparative advantage in a given product tend to improve their product quality as opposed to lowering production costs, so they compete on the quality-adjusted price. Research limitations/implications - This paper used product-level data to examine the spatial pattern of the average export unit value of a product, which is able to answer the question of whether an industry is involved with quality competition. The product-level data used in this study, however, are not ideally suitable for exploring the predictions of a heterogeneous firms' trade model. Originality/value - To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first paper that investigates a relationship between the country-product pair of comparative advantages and firms' self-selection behavior in the product-level data to shed light on the role of product quality in determining the structure of firms' competition.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 190
页数:17
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
aursen K., 1998, REVEALED COMPARATIVE, P98
[2]   TRADE LIBERALISATION AND REVEALED COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BALASSA, B .
MANCHESTER SCHOOL OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL STUDIES, 1965, 33 (02) :99-123
[3]   Zeros, Quality, and Space: Trade Theory and Trade Evidence [J].
Baldwin, Richard ;
Harrigan, James .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2011, 3 (02) :60-88
[4]   Quality Competition Versus Price Competition Goods: An Empirical Classification [J].
Baldwin, Richard E. ;
Ito, Tadashi .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION, 2011, 26 (01) :110-135
[5]   The quality of a firm's exports Where you export to matters [J].
Bastos, Paulo ;
Silva, Joana .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 82 (02) :99-111
[6]  
Francisco A., 2009, WORKING PAPERS FUND
[7]   The Long and Short (of) Quality Ladders [J].
Khandelwal, Amit .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2010, 77 (04) :1450-1476
[8]  
Kugler M., 2008, 14418 NAT BUR EC RES
[9]  
Mandel B.R., 2010, INT FINANCE DISCUSSI
[10]   Export Prices Across Firms and Destinations [J].
Manova, Kalina ;
Zhang, Zhiwei .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2012, 127 (01) :379-436